My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00406
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:24 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:53:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0004X
Contractor Name
Green Mountain Exchange Project CWRDA
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Grand
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />--_.....-~_._~-- -.- .-----.- -----------~----_._.-..------.-----~--- <br /> <br />------------------ <br /> <br />l....-i <br /> <br />Table 3.4 lists the additional projects and expansion of existing projects operated in the two <br />Future-Level Use Scenarios along with their additional average annual depletions above the Existing- <br />Level Use Scenario, These demands were identified by reviewing the following documents: "Draft <br />Supplement to the Final Environmental Statement for the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, Water <br />Marketing Program for Ruedi Reservoir", (Simons, et aI., 1983); "Application for License for Project <br />No. 2511, Redcliff Project", (Fleming, 1977); "1984 Development Work for the Redcliff Project", <br />(Western, 1984); and supplemental information provided by DWB and CRWCD. <br /> <br />In the Moderate Future-Level Use Scenario, the water use in the basin was increased above <br />the Existing Level by an annual average of 14,000 af of in-basin municipal and industrial depletions, <br />3000 af for oil-shale development and 21,000 af of transmountain diversions. <br /> <br />In the High Future-Level Use Scenario, the average annual water use was increased to <br />provide an additional 64,000 af for in-basin irrigation, municipal and industrial uses other than oil <br />shale; 133,000 af for oil-shale development; and 36,000 af for transmountain diversions. <br /> <br />An estimated total future demand averaging 136,000 af per year was used in the operating <br />simulation for oil-shale development in the Colorado River Basin. This figure was based upon those <br />projects for which Biological Consultations are filed with the U,S. Fish and Wildlife Service and upon <br />quantities requested in applications to USBR under the Green Mountain Reservoir and Ruedi Water <br />Sales Programs (Simons, et aI., 1983; RCI, 1985), Of this total, 3,000 af was supplied from the Green <br />Mountain Reservoir Water Marketing Sales in all three scenarios; and 3,000 af and 40,000 af were <br />provided under the Ruedi Reservoir Water Marketing Sales in the Moderate and High Future-Level <br />Use Scenarios, respectively, The balance of the 93,000 af annual demand for oil shale in the High <br />Future-Level Use Scenario was assumed to be supplied from the Colorado River in the vicinity of <br />Parachute and DeBeque and in the Main Elk Creek Basin, <br /> <br />3-12 <br /> <br />; <br />i...-' <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />L....: <br /> <br />-' <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />--' <br /> <br />:....., <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.