Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1< <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />.. <br />HYDRO <br /> <br />APPENDIX A <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />.. <br />ENGINEERING <br /> <br />CONSULTING WATER ENGINEERS <br />BOX 11223 PUEBLO, COLORADO 81001 303-546-0169 <br /> <br />Mr. Nick Ioannides <br />Colorado Water Conservation <br />1301 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> <br />February 20, 1979 <br /> <br />Board <br /> <br />Mr. Tom Stephenson, <br />Beaver Park Water, Inc. <br />Box 286 <br />Penrose, Colorado 81240 <br /> <br />I FEB 22 1979 <br />CULl.' . ,-:....:.J <br />alNSERV . .. ,d ~ rI <br />A TlON BOARD <br /> <br /> <br />PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY OF BEAVER PARK <br />IRRIGATION SYSTEM REHABILITATION AND REPAIRS <br /> <br />The Board of Directors of the Beaver Park Water, Inc., a mutual ditch <br />company at Penrose in Fremont County, desire to cooperate with the Colorado <br />Water Conservation Board to undertake a feasibility study of the repairs <br />necessary to upgrade the existing irrigation system in order to reduce <br />system losses, reduce waste of water, and promote better water management. <br />Hydro Engineering of Pueblo, Colorado, proposes to prepare this feasibility <br />study for Beaver Park Water, Inc., and the Colorado Water Conservation Board. <br />The study will be prepared in accordance with the guidelines of the Colorado <br />Water Conservation Board. <br /> <br />The major components to be addressed by the feasibility study will include <br />a general description of the irrigation system, water rights, crops and <br />irrigated acreage, financial status, 20-year diversion records, analysis of <br />water deliveries to shareholders, and calculation of transmission losses. <br />Beaver Park Water has requested that four snecific components of the system <br />be evaluated for rehabilitation orreplacement. Evaluation of these four <br />components would comprise the major, tasks of the feasibility study and are <br />as follows: <br /> <br />1. Rehabilitation and repairs to the diversion dam and headgates, <br />including removal of sand and debris above the dam; <br /> <br />2. Evaluation of piping or ditch lining or a combination of both for <br />all of the Upper Canal, including new lateral headgates and measuring <br />devices at all laterals; <br /> <br />3. Rehabilitation of Brush Hollow Dam outlet structure, including the <br />outlet gate, tube, valves, and spillway; <br /> <br />4. Evaluation of piping or ditch lining of the Lower Canal from Brush <br />Hollow Dam part-way to the Third Street crossing, in the area of <br />greatest ditch loss. <br /> <br />APPENDIX A <br />GROUNDWATER. HYDROLOGY. WATER RIGHTS . WATER QUALITY . WATER SUPPLY . SEWER STUDIES <br />