Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l'7 <br />" <br /> <br />Exhibit A <br />Grant for Proposed Feasibility Study of Long Hollow Reservoir and Red Mesa Reservoir Enlargement <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />P <br />i. <br />I:: <br /> <br />~. <br />~'.' <br />\h <br />>1..;' <br /> <br />The dam was originally constructed in 1915. After the dam was washed out in a flood in <br />1929, the dam was rebuilt in 1945 to its current configuration. The reservoir, which is <br />used for irrigation, is filled annually by natural inflows and a diversion from the La Plata <br /> <br />River. In dry and average years, the reservoir is totally drained to meet irrigation water <br />demands. <br /> <br />Harris Water Engineering conducted a Red Mesa Reservoir Enlargement Feasibility <br />Study that focused on assessing the availability of water for filling the enlarged reservoir <br />to 4,070 AF, to provide both agricultural and domestic water. That study indicated that <br />the current dam's earth embankment has a height of 59 feet, a length of 420 feet, and a <br />crest width of 10 feet. The normal storage capacity of the reservoir is 1,172 acre-feet <br />(AF), with a maximum storage capacity of 1,454 AF. The spillway, located on the left <br />abutment of the dam, is 35 feet wide and approximately 6 feet deep. The spil1way has a <br />capacity of2,126 cubic feet per second (cfs). The outlet works, a 2-foot by 4-foot arched <br />tunnel near the left abutment of the dam, have a capacity of 138 cfs. <br /> <br />The Harris study identified a need to repair the existing outlet tower and enlarge the <br />spillway, and recommended consideration of the reservoir enlargement since the repair <br />work would present an opportunity to conduct the enlargement work in an efficient <br />manner. <br /> <br />r,,' <br /> <br />[ <br /> <br />1"." <br />I <br />L,', <br /> <br />r-'. <br />!",. <br />",. <br />td <br /> <br />',' <br />1'.: <br />U <br /> <br />It is important to note that some critical permitting has already been obtained for the <br />proposed enlargement, As part of the initial feasibility work, a Clean Water Act Section <br />404 Permit was obtained and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) issued a . <br />biological opinion under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. Renewal of this <br />permit is now being reviewed by the Army Corps of Engineers. A minimal amount of <br />time has been included in the scope of work and cost estimate for the Section 404, permit <br />renewal work. <br /> <br />~' <br />.:',. <br />:1j <br /> <br /> <br />f!i.. <br />~i; <br /> <br />I.: <br />I <br />I:':' <br /> <br />The Harris Water Engineering study of the Red Mesa Reservoir enlargement relied upon <br />geological and geotechnical stmlies completed in 1975 by the Soil Conservation Service <br />(SCS) in cooperation with the La Plata Soil Conservation District. The SCS field <br />investigation consisted of drilling eight geotechnical test holes to investigate the <br />condition ofthe abutment of the dam and possible emergency spillway areas; 41 test pits <br />dug with a backhoe; and the col1ection of six disturbed soil samples for analysis by a <br />soils laboratory. <br /> <br />WWE has reviewed the SCS files. Although they provide valuable and useab1e <br />information, the feasibility study will require collection and evaluation of some additional <br />geotechnical data. Little site-specific information is available relative to topography, <br />wetlands, hydrology, cultural resources and threatened/endangered species, other than the <br />endangered fish in the San Juan River. These items have been ineluded as part of the <br />proposed work plan for this application. <br /> <br />f' <br />r'," <br />l.:" <br /> <br />t, <br />l; <br />r. <br /> <br />n. <br />~ <br />B <br /> <br />I.... <br />