Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ ' <br />'I <br />' ' <br /> <br /> <br />'., <br />II' <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />tl <br />I <br />:1 <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />:1 <br />I <br />\I <br />\1 <br /> <br />EV ALUA II ON OPAL TE RNATE REPAIRS ' , ' <br />, ' . <br />TO THE CACHE LA f>OUDRE RESERVOIR DAMS. :,,' <br /> <br />. ... ~ <br />.,' - ~ . <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Taking all factors into consideration, <br />that Alternate No. lor Alternate No. <br />factory repair to the existing dams. <br /> <br />it is our recommendation <br />2B would provide a satis- <br /> <br />. <br />Both altern~tes provide either a cutoff to reduce seepage or <br />control seepage 'under the dam and an impervious face to reduce <br />seepage through the existing dam. By constructing a new embank- <br />ment on the upstream dam face and a new embankment on the down- <br />stream face, the stability of the dam is greatly increased. <br />.-. , <br />Also, the construction of a ne\q outlet and service spillway will <br />, - <br />provide a safety feature that cannot be guaranteed by repairs <br />to the existing outlet tunnel and channel. Indirectly, the new <br />outlet will also provide an increased stability of the dam in <br />that excavation of the existing outlet means removal and recon- <br />struction of the poorest section of the dam. Renovation of the <br />existing spillway would be as according to the State Engineer's <br />requirements. If repair to the existing dam is authorized, it <br />is imperative to commence the schedule enclosed in,order to start <br />construction by fall of 1976. <br /> <br />.+~ .f <br /> <br />-.. ~-- <br /> <br />",. H , <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />'- -". <br /> <br />.... . <br /> <br />)1 <br /> <br />.' , <br />'..;'i..:,:. ':..... <br /> <br />, ; <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />, , <br />, .. <br />, . <br />.. ", <br /> <br />-..- <br /> <br />....: <br /> <br />, I <br />, <br /> <br />- t.-- <br />