Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1\ <br />.1 <br />Ii <br />II <br />:1 <br />J <br />'I <br /> <br />, ' <br />I <br /> <br />'I <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />'I <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />') <br />,/) <br />/ <br /> <br />~ <br />.- <br /> <br />, .. <br />,'d. Construction of an emergency spillway capable of <br />meeting 'the State Engineer's requirements. By con- <br />structing the service spillway in the outlet works <br />. and providing approximately 2.5 feet of freeboard <br />between the service spillway flowline and the emer- <br />gency spillway flowline, a considerable reduction of <br />'the cost of the emergency spillway can be made. The <br />2.5 foot storm storage between the service and emer- <br />gency spiJlways will essentially provide a safe con- <br />trol and discharge of a "50 year" rainstorm. (Proba- <br />bility of occurring once in 50 years). The emergency <br />spillway would thus become an overflow area capable <br />of meeting the maximum probable flood criteria. Hence, <br />the spillway may need a control section in excess <br />of 1000 feet, but it shall be constructed of earth <br />and sod, with reinforcement by soils cement at the, <br />, water surface only. ' The spillway could be constructed <br />at two different sites, from borrow areas used in <br />construction of the embankment fills. It appears <br />,evident that additional right-of-way or land shall be <br />, required for 'expansion of the existing spillway. As <br />, stated above, ,land used for right-of-way for the spill- <br />way may also contain soils adequate for the construction <br />of the embank~ent fills, thus helping to reduce the <br />cost of excavation and haul. It is estimated that <br />an additional 15 acres of land may be needed to the <br />east of the existing spillway. It should be noted <br />that the spillway can be designed so as to permit <br />farming in the spillway channel below the overflow <br />crest. The only time crops would face potential <br />damage would be during an extremely large rainfall <br />when the reservoir was full. This ~tem shall be the <br />same for Alternates 2A and 2B. <br /> <br />Alternate No. 2A (FULL CUTOFF) <br /> <br />Estimated Cost . . . . . . <br /> <br />Repairs: <br /> <br />a. See Alternate 1 <br /> <br />b. Construction of an impervious earth fill cutoff along <br />the face of Dam No.1. This cutoff would be the <br />same as Alternate No. I, except that at the bottom <br />of the cutoff trench, sheet piling would be driven <br />through the sand and sandy silt to bedrock to provide <br />the complete seepage cutoff. The sheet piling would <br />eliminate the need for relief drains along the toe <br />of the dam. It should be noted that the extremely <br />dense sand layer may make driving sheet piling a <br />difficult job and additional tests must be performed <br />before this alternate could be finalized. <br /> <br />"' <br /> <br />$1,549,525 <br /> <br />See Alternate I <br />See Alternate 1 <br /> <br />-,-'- <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />-4" <br /> <br />.: .' <br /> <br />~ - ..--.' - - - , <br /> <br />. .'-:~;',-. <br />