Laserfiche WebLink
<br />>>",' <br />, - <br /> <br />- . >>~.... " -.., -. --'.' <br /> <br />,_..'0" <br /> <br />II <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />II <br />11 <br />I <br /> <br />II <br />11 <br />II <br />:1 <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />..":"':.,.J.;-,:' _ <br /> <br />'..,., .. <br />. . ' <br /> <br />-.. ~ .: <br /> <br />'':'' . <br /> <br />~~;.:~::<. :- ~~::;,:- <br />, .. ~, - .,.'" <br />., :',:,~7'. ". :.. ...~ ' <br /> <br />',,- EVALUATION OF ALTE~~ATE REPAIRS <br />TO THE CACHE LA POUDRE RESERVOIR DAMS <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br />--,>.'..... <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />'. ~. . <br /> <br />The purpose of this report is to present an engineering evalu- <br />ation of alternate repairs to the Cache La Poudre Reservoir Dams. <br />The report was authorized in August of 1975 at a meeting of the <br />Board of Directors and the Advisory Committ~e of the ,Cache La <br />POlldre Reservoir Company. As of that time, the Reservoir <br />Company had taken under advisement an Engineer's Reconnaissance <br />Study,of the existing dams and an evaluation report for alternate <br />locations of a new dam downstream of the existing dam. <br /> <br />"':'- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />, , <br /> <br />. ~ - . , - <br />'. ~ ' - .'.~' . . <br /> <br />-~ . ._->>~ - ;--'- -. <br /> <br />The investigation was carried out by studying the cross sections <br />of the existing dam as previously surveyed, by studying the soils <br />and subsurface conditions of the existing dams as previously <br />prepared by Empire Laboratories, by analyzing the topography <br />adjacent to the reservoir for potential emergency spillway <br />sites, and by carefully analyzing the existing outlet works <br />and present operating features of the reservoir. Detailed <br />field and office calculations were completed and the individual <br />elements were combined into 3 alternate repairs to'the existing <br />dams. Many factors and considerations not evident in ~he three <br />alternates were carefully analyzed before these alternate repairs <br />were selected. It was the opinion of the engineers that the re-, <br />pairs suggested be capable of a long life span and require a <br />minimum of extended maintenance beyond a reasonable service <br />level. It was also felt that due to the complexity of the <br />repairs necessary to e~s~re the stability of the dams, careful <br />thought should be given to all aspetts of the dam to'ensure <br />safety of features that may not be readily apparent from sur- <br />face observations. Wtih all considerations, the finished re- <br />pairs should provide a structure capable of maintaining the ,.., . ' <br />quality of operation and performance as the existing structure <br />has done for many years. <br /> <br />..... .-. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. . ._:~.:...::~ -"_.'-::.. '~o-'..' <br />