My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00370
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00370
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:22 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:51:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0031X
Contractor Name
Yampa Project DNR 1972
Contract Type
Miscellaneous
Water District
0
County
Moffat
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />III. FEASIBILITY OF ENLARGING THE ELKHEAD CREEK RESERVOIR <br />1. Hydrology. Based on the stream flow record at the U.S. Geological <br />Survey's Gaging Stations No. 9-2450 and 9-2455, monthly average inflow <br />hydrographs at the dam site are derived and plotted on page A-I in <br />Appendix A. Mass curves of reservoir inflow versus outflows including <br />the release for four 350 MW units operation are presented on page A-2 <br /> <br />to demonstrate that there is sufficient stream flow in the Elkhead <br /> <br />Creek to fill up the reservoir each and every year after the reservoir <br /> <br />is lowered annually for all the requirements. <br /> <br /> <br />During the low stream flow period, July 1962 thru May 1965, reservoir <br />operation studies were made as shown in Tables A-I and A-2 for both <br /> <br /> <br />the (2) 350 MW and (4) 350 MW operation conditions. In the case of <br /> <br /> <br />(4) 350 MW operation, it is found that with an added dam height of <br /> <br /> <br />24 feet, the minimum reservoir level after 90 days withdrawal for <br /> <br /> <br />plant operation will not be lower than elevation 6340.5 feet which <br /> <br /> <br />is the normal pond level proposed originally by the Colorado Division <br /> <br /> <br />of Wildlife. <br /> <br />The standing of water rights which will affect the availability of <br /> <br /> <br />stream flow for reservoir storage was investigated and evaluated <br /> <br /> <br />with results shown in Appendix B. It concluded that the Elkhead Creek <br />contains sufficient stream flow to fill the reservoir and maintain <br /> <br />the reservoir level. The present diversion from the creek amounts <br /> <br />to approximately 50 cubic feet per second. However, two potential <br /> <br />problems do exist; two reservoirs have been proposed and both hold <br /> <br />conditional water rights on the Elkhead Creek that are senior to <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.