Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Alternatives Evaluated <br /> <br />A range of alternatives were considered including 1) don't build the project, 2) repair the <br />structure saving as much of the old structure as possible, 3) completely remove the old <br />structure and replace it with a new structure, and 4) abolish the river diversion structure and <br />replace it with pumped well water. <br /> <br />A subjective evaluation of the alternatives follows: <br /> <br />L Don't build the project: <br /> <br />Shareholders would be unable to irrigate 4,400 acres of cropland. The do <br />nothing alternative is not feasible! <br /> <br />2, Repair the existing structure: <br /> <br />Repairing this structure will enable the Company to divert water and operate its <br />recharge project before the irrigation season, This alternative would also be the <br />most economical. This alternative is feasible and is considered the preferred <br />alternative. <br /> <br />3. Completely remove the old structure and replace it with a new structure: <br /> <br />This would increase the cost of the project considerably with no added benefits, <br />This alternative is feasible but not very economical. <br /> <br />4, Abolish the use of the river structure and pump well water into the ditch: <br /> <br />This alternative would be contingent on the plan being approved by the water <br />court. Considering the time getting court approval and construction time, water <br />would be unavailable for shareholders to irrigate this summer. This alternative <br />is not feasible, <br /> <br />The Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD) provided technical engineering <br />assistance in the evaluation of the above alternatives, particularly concerning the type and <br />configuration of gate structures for the headgate and for the river dam. Pneumatic crest gate <br />systems (from Obermeyer Hydro Accessories, Inc.) as well as radial gates, lift gates, and flash <br />boards were considered. The critical design issue was to keep sand from washing into and <br />plugging the ditch. This required that water flow over the top of the ditch headgate (low <br />approach velocity with little sand), and out the bottom of the adjacent river dam sluice gate <br />(where high velocity washes the sand downstream,) <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />.. <br />