Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I- <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />II- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />The Grand Mesa Project can provide numerous benefits to the project <br /> <br /> <br />service area and Delta County. A value of 1.9:1 has been calculated as the <br /> <br /> <br />benefit/cost ratio for direct benefits from the project. Indirect benefits, <br /> <br /> <br />such as increased employment and greater stability in the economy, are <br /> <br /> <br />difficult to quantify but tend to increase the benefit/cost ratio. A summary <br /> <br /> <br />of direct benefits is shown in the following table. <br /> <br />Summary of Projects Benefits <br /> <br />Purpose <br />Irrigation <br />Hydropower <br />Municipal & Domestic <br />Recreation <br /> <br />Total Annual Benefits <br />$2,215,100 <br />528,000 <br />120,000 <br />26,000 <br /> <br />Total <br /> <br />$2,889,100 <br /> <br />The report finds that an ample supply of water is physically available in <br />the project area. With the development of additional storage in Cactus Park <br />Reservoir, a timely supply can be delivered to presently irrigated lands in <br />greater quantity than has been historically used. <br /> <br />The Grand Mesa Project as presented in this report is the most viable <br />water development scheme yet proposed for the area. The biggest single factor <br />for this viability is the prospect of partial repayment from the sale of <br />hydro-electricity. The 2500 KW power plant considered in this project <br />configuration is expected to contribute over $500,000 to help offset the $1.4 <br />million annual project repayment cost. Future studies should include <br />investigations of other hydropower sites which could be incorporated into the <br />project and further offset repayment costs. <br /> <br />Additionally, further studies should include <br />gaging facilities at specific points in the area. <br />and past studies has been the lack of factual <br /> <br />funding for accurate stream <br /> <br /> <br />A major limitation to this <br /> <br /> <br />water supply data. Data <br /> <br />-4- <br />