Laserfiche WebLink
<br />J <br />I <br />j <br />J <br />J <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />J, <br />I <br />. <br />1 <br />. <br />], <br />..i <br /> <br />l <br />, <br />1 <br />1 <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Water at Storage Needs Assessment <br />SECWCDI Assessment Enterprise <br />Septem ber 23, 1998 <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />The Southeastern Colorado Water Storage Needs Assessment Enterprise, under the auspices of <br />the Southern Colorado Water Conservancy District (the District) commissioned a study in <br />June 1997 to assess the water and storage needs of District members, The draft study was <br />completed in September 1998, <br /> <br />This report presents the fmdings from the study, which is termed the SECWCD/Arkansas Basin <br />Water and Storage Needs Assessment Project. The study was conducted by a team of engineers <br />and specialists, including GEl Consultants, Inc" Helton and Williamsen, P.C" and David <br />Bamberger & Associates. The study included a review of existing water supplies available to <br />the District water users; projection of future populations and demands for water in the municipal <br />sector; an assessment of historic '1gricultural water use; assessment of water and storage needs; <br />and evaluation of potential water supply storage and management options for the District to <br />consider, The District entities currently use an average approximately I million acre-feet (at) <br />per year of which 80 percent is for irrigation, If agricultural use is held constant, water use is <br />projected to increase up to 1J 8 million af per year under a "high groWth" scenario. - <br /> <br />As part of the planning process, the District constituted. a Storage Study Committee (SSC) <br />comprised of District members interested in identifying ways to meet the growing water needs <br />of the municipal sector while maintaining current levels of agricultural water use and production, <br />The SSC provided extensive guidance to the work, 'as well as reviews of many interi~ work <br />products, <br /> <br />Key findings of the Assessment Project studies are summarized below: <br /> <br />1. District population, Figure ES-I, is expected to increase by 578,000 to 886,000 persons, <br />depending on whether a "base" or "high" forecast is used, Municipal water demands in <br />the District's service area are expected to be 94,000to 159,000 afhigher than the current <br />levels, Figure ES-2, The larger incremental water demand is based on a population <br />growth rate equivalent to 2 percent per year, (Conservation measures are assumed to <br />, result in 10 percent demand reduction and are reflected in the demand estimates), <br /> <br />2, Water resources available to municipal entities are generally adequate to meet demands <br />for the "base case" scenario (94,000 af of additional demand), except for certain entities <br />in the Fountain Valley and several towns West of Pueblo. Approximately 11,000 af of <br />additional water supply will be needed, unless other entities are willing to reallocate <br />water- supplies that exceed their forecast needs, <br /> <br />97411\REPORTS\TEX;T_A. WPD <br /> <br />~ GEl Consultants, lnc, <br />