My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00335
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00335
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:03:42 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:50:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153512
Contractor Name
Summit County
Water District
64
County
Logan
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />y' <br /> <br />.. <br />v <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />~ <br /> <br />COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />721 State Centennial Building <br />'313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866.3441 <br /> <br />M E M 0 RAN DUM <br /> <br />Rov Romer <br />Governor <br />]. William McDonald <br />DIrector <br />DaVid \,\'. Willker <br />Depulv [.ifectar <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Members, CWCB <br /> <br />FROM: Bill McDonald <br /> <br />DATE: March 15, 1988 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Agenda Item 22, March 21-22, 1988, Board Meeting-- <br />Request for Feasibility Study, Summit County <br /> <br />Summit County and the municipalities therein wish to <br />examine the possibility of additional storage above Uillon <br />Reservoir in order to have water for future development needs, <br />the county's fishery resources. and other Objectives. I <br />wholeheartedly agree with the need for this study, it being my <br />understanding that the streams above Dillon Reservoir cannot <br />withstand depletions in the winter months above and bevond <br />those contemplated by the Department of Natural Resources/Ski <br />Area Agreements without causing significant damage to the <br />fishery resource. <br /> <br />A draft of the Scope of Work which is contemplated for this <br />study is enclosed, It is anticipated that the results of this <br />initial study will lead to further analysis of the most <br />promising alternatives identified, <br /> <br />It is proposed that $80,000 be budgeted on this initial <br />effort. The county and the municipalities have requested that <br />the Board fund 75 percent of this amount, or $60,000. I <br />believe that this is an appropriate allocation of costs in view <br />of the fact that there will be no single beneficiary of the <br />alternatives which will be examined. Rather, the alternatives <br />under consideration will be to the benefit of all water users <br />and the county generally. Under the circumstances, I believe <br />that Board participation in excess of the usual 50 percent cost <br />share is appropriate. <br /> <br />I recommend that the Board approve the requested <br />feasibility study subject to the conditions that: <br /> <br />(1) The Board will provide funding for 75 percent of the <br />study cost. not to exceed $60,000, <br /> <br />6430E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.