Laserfiche WebLink
<br />II <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />COST ESTIMATES <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Appraisal-level cost estimates were developed for a Hardin Dam Project <br /> <br /> <br />both with and without flood control as previously described. Total capi tal <br /> <br /> <br />cost estimates include construction cost, land acquisition costs and an <br /> <br /> <br />allowance for engineering, permitting and other ancillary costs. For a <br /> <br /> <br />project with flood control, the total capital cost is estimated at <br /> <br /> <br />$291,000,000 or $298,000,000 depending upon the method of short term con- <br /> <br /> <br />struction financing used. For a project without flood control the total <br /> <br /> <br />capital cost is estimated at $263,000,000 or $270,000,000 depending again upon <br /> <br /> <br />the method of short term construction financing used. These costs are in <br /> <br /> <br />January, 1982 dollars unadjusted for inflation during construction and <br /> <br /> <br />financing costs. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />It should also be noted that these estimates do not include costs for <br /> <br />recreational facilities or for environmental mitigation measures. These costs <br /> <br /> <br />would have to be developed in a feasibility-level study for the Hardin Dam <br /> <br /> <br />Project. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />These total ~apital costs were escalated for inflation throughout an <br /> <br /> <br />assumed planning and construction period. The escalated costs were then used <br /> <br /> <br />to estimate total investment costs and the annual cost of assumed debt retire- <br /> <br />ment. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Total investment costs were illustrated by assuming two different financ- <br /> <br /> <br />ing approaches. Under the first approach, it was assumed that the project <br /> <br /> <br />would be financed by use of the CWCB' s construction fund and that capital <br /> <br /> <br />costs would be amortized at 5 percent for 40 years. The second approach <br /> <br /> <br />assumed the issuance of tax-exempt revenue bonds by a political subdivision of <br /> <br /> <br />the state, with capital costs amortized at 12 percent for 30 years. Interest <br /> <br /> <br />during construction (i.e., the cost of short term construction financing) was <br /> <br /> <br />added to capital costs under the revenue bonding approach, which is why the <br /> <br /> <br />total capital costs noted above differ. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />vii <br /> <br />I <br />