Laserfiche WebLink
' <br />' <br />� <br />' <br />t <br />�J <br />' <br />' <br />' <br />ll <br />' <br />places the rehabilitation cost near the current value of the water. However, the cost is expected <br />to be less than the future value of the water and should prove to be a good invesunent. <br />Following is a cost to benefit analysis of the project. <br />Total Project Cost including interest <br />$26,900 x 30 years + $4,240 + $48,600 = $ 859,840 <br />Total Cost oer Share of Stock <br />$859,840 = 160 = $5,374 <br />Cost Per Share of Stock Per Year <br />$5,374 = 30 years = $179 <br />Cost Per Acre-foot Of Water Delivered For An Average Year <br />$859,840 = (111 A-Ft x 30 yrs) _ $258 <br />The current value of the water is expected to be in the range of $6,000 to $8,000 per acre foot. <br />This is based on the price of water sold in Northern Colorado over the past year. Over the 30 year <br />life of the loan the value would be expected to be much higher than the current value of the water. <br />For the analysis we have used the upper end of the current value due to this. <br />Benefit/Cost =[$8,000 x 111 A-Ft] =$859,840 = 1.03 <br />' <br />' <br />' <br />At the current value of water the project barely has a positive benefit to cost ratio. This ratio <br />would be expected to be greater than this if the future value of the water is utilized. <br />COLLATERAL <br />The Lake Canal Reservoir Company can offer the following collateral for the CWCB loan. <br />' 1. The revenue from assessments as allowed by the Company By-Laws and Articles of <br />Incorporation. <br />2. A certificate of deposit account in the amount of one annual payment to be held by the <br />' State Treasurer. <br />3. Assignment of the land the reservoir occupies. <br />' <br />' <br />Gray Lake-Feasibiliry Study <br />Page 10 <br />' <br />