My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00283
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00283
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:16 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:47:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0009X
Contractor Name
Swink, Town of
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Otero
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2. Increases the total quantity of potable water supply required, thereby <br />increasing annual treatment costs. <br />3. Requires reconnection of all existing services. <br />4. Increase the initial capital costs of improvements. <br /> <br />4.1.3 Sub-Alternates. Additional sub-alternatives were considered under the <br />two basic alternate plans including the purchase of a supplemental water supply <br />from the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District via the proposed Arkansas <br />Valley Conduit. An update on the status of the Arkansas Valley Conduit project <br />was received from the Water Conservancy District. Apparently the project is still <br />in the planning stages and is contingent on a number of items including favorable <br />action from Washington. Scheduling of construction of the pipeline has not been <br />established (even tentatively) at this time. At best, the realization of a treated <br />water supply delivered to the town of Swink from the Arkansas Valley conduit is <br />many years in the future. Consideration can be given for utilizing this supply <br />source as a supplemental water supply only for later stages of development. Initial <br />improvements must be based on the town's existing water supplies. <br /> <br />The various costs of the alternate selected is summarized later in this report. <br />Based on the advantages and disadvantages listed for the two basic alternatives, <br />the estimated costs for operation and maintenance, and reliability of the system, <br />Alternate No. 1 is selected as the plan to be developed. <br /> <br />4.2 PHYSICAL PLAN <br /> <br />Having laid a foundation of population growth, status of existing facilities, and <br />a projection of present and future water requirements, a plan is hereafter evolved <br />to expand the existing facilities in stages to meet these requirements. <br /> <br />4.2.1 Distribution System. A major improvement project is necessary at the <br />present time to correct deficiencies and maintenance problems in the existing <br />system and to provide required fire flows to all parts of town. Once an adequate <br />base system is constructed, it can be extended in short segments as the need occurs. <br />As growth occurs andr:lhe landis:developed,:the_Town"should:requirerthe'owner" or <br />developer of the property to install an adequate distribution system at no cost <br />or little cost to the Town. When examining a proposed extension plan it must be <br />kept in mind that the developer must not only provide a distribution system and <br />fire flow to his "development,: but the mains must be adequately sized:to extend <br />beyond his immediate development and provide fire flows to the property beyond. <br /> <br />Proposed improvements to the potable water distribution system are shown on <br />Plate II. Proposed improvements to the non-potable distribution system are shown <br />on Plate III. <br /> <br />Figure I shows the total design area to be considered up to year 2020 and Figure <br />III shows the major distribution main gridwork necessary to deliver fire flows to <br />the design area. While the gridwork can be constructed on a piecemeal basis, the <br />grid must be completed and the loops closed in order to deliver the required flows. <br /> <br />The design area shown on Figure I encompasses approximately 640 acres. It is es- <br />timated that approximately 100 acres of this total will be included in railroad, <br />school, highway, and other public lands. The remaining 540 acres would be utilized <br />for residential and commercial development. At the design population of 1664 <br />(median projection for year 2020) this would be an average population density of <br />3.1 persons per acre. This results in an extremely low population density and the <br />design area will be roughly 1/2 developed at the design population of 1664. <br />Population density within the existing Town is approximately 5.5 persons per acre <br />and include numerous vacant lots. Using the high population projection for the <br /> <br />-23- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.