Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The second spillway location will not require the purchase of <br />Right-Of-Way to get the flows into the natural drainage chann~l. <br />However, the Windsor Ditch creates a dam across the natural <br />drainage which will backup the spillway flows all the way to the <br />dam toe. Thus, a berm will have to be built along the spillway <br />channel to keep the flows retained until the ditch bank is <br />breached. This type of embankment is often hard to hold during <br />high flows and is not structurally appealing. <br /> <br />For both spillways proposed the entrance channel will be <br />approximately 300 feet wide, the control section 250 feet wide and <br />the channel beyond the control section will be approximately 300 <br />feet wide. The extra width at the inlet and outlet will help <br />reduce the velocities and minimize the amount of riprap protection <br />required. The control section will consist of a concrete wall <br />that is riprapped for protection. Since both spillways will be <br />cut through natural materials at the abutments of the dams, <br />erosion protection other than seeding will not be required except <br />at the control section and at any changes in the channel align- <br />ment. <br /> <br />The proposed spillway section of 250 feet will flow 4.5 feet <br />deep at the peak discharge for the 0.75 PMP flood. The spillway <br />control section will be at Gage Height 24 feet with the peak at <br />Gage Height 28.5 feet which is U.S.G.S.Elevation 5233.1 feet. A <br />typical spillway section is shown in Appendix H. <br /> <br />E. Drainaqe. Special drainage problems occur at the site in <br />conjunction with the two spillway locations proposed but are <br />discussed in Section D above. With regard to the general site <br />drainage from local runoff, no special problems are expected on <br />the site due to drainage except at the toe of the East Dam. The <br />ponding of water at the toe between the dam and the Windsor Ditch <br />will have to be eliminated by filling the depression or by <br />providing a swale to the west to provide drainage away from the <br />dam toe. Surface drainage must be provided for in all areas of <br />new construction to prevent future ponding. Underseepage from the <br />reservoir will occur but for the most part will be controlled by <br />the toe drains which will intercept and divert any underseepage <br />into the natural drainage ways below the dams. <br /> <br />F. Sedimentation. Estimates of sediment yield are complex and <br />involve numerous assumptions and laboratory determination of <br />site-specific parameters. (Linsley, Ray K., Jr. et al: Hvdroloqv <br />for Enqineers, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982, pp. 311-338. Bureau <br />of Reclamation: Desian of Small Dams, U. S. Government Printing <br />Office, Washington, 1974, pp. 767-796). Due to the difficulty of <br />conducting this type of study it was determined a reasonable <br />approach would be to utilize previous studies conducted by the <br />Soil Conservation Service for Dams B-2 and B-3. Both of these <br />dams are within 3 to 4 miles of the Reservoir No. 2 site and have <br />soil characteristics similar to Reservoir No. 2 The watershed for <br />B-3 is very similar to the drainage basin for Reservoir No. 2 in <br />which the flows through the basin are intermittent and occur only <br /> <br />V-5 <br />