Laserfiche WebLink
q bw <br />STAGECOACH RES ERVDIR PROJECT - ECP <br />Commitments 7/ <br />16-DEC-88 14:56:]9 Pg 1 <br />Reference Page Protect Stage <br />Document Number <br />Dsgn Const ObM <br />CONTENTS <br />-FISHERY ................................1-10 <br />-WILDLIFE <br />-Big Came ........................ .....11-IS <br />-Wetlands <br />-General ..............................16-21 <br />-78 Acre We[land ......................18-19 <br />-Riparian areas above <br />and below dam .......................22-26 <br />-Reservoir Fringe .......................26 <br />-Remaining 87 ac res ..................27-J2 <br />-Fish b Wild life-General ..............11-34 <br />-RECREATION ............................J6-45 <br />-CONSTRUCTION ..........................46-87 <br />-CULTURAL RESOURCES .......... .............58 <br />-OTHER COMMITMENTS .....................59-77 <br />GENEfiAL COMMENTS: <br />On 11/02/8A at the ECP review meetinP a main focus of concern seemed <br />to center on those commitments that required attention prior to the <br />initiation ar completion of reservoir filling. Following is a list of those <br />commitments: 1,2,7,4,5,8,16,18,19,22,27,25,27,28,29,]0,] 1,]2,36,36,40,41, <br />5],54,57,66, and 68. <br />FISIIERY <br />1. Prior to the Start of reservoir construction, FES <br />B/ UYWCD will prepare with input from BR, DOW, 404 <br />EPA b FWS a water quality management plan far <br />submittal [o the COE for their review and <br />approval. The plan will provide far the <br />operation of the reservoir and dam to minimize <br />adverse impacts to the aquatic ecosystem in <br />downstream reaches of the Yampa River and <br />maximize water quality within the reservoir. <br />- The plan will include an operation plan and a <br />monitoring plan. <br />-Results of ali water quality monitoring <br />activity shall be submitted for review to the <br />coE. <br />- UYWCD will refine the reservoir operation plan <br />as data from the water quality monitoring plan <br />becomes available and if necessary, petition the <br />Water Quality Control Commission of the Stale of <br />Colorado to set a nutrient standard for the <br />reservoir. <br />Responsible Comments <br />(HOnitoring)I/ and <br />Party Commitment Status <br /> <br />171,149 X X X DYWCD -4/22/87 Draft plan to C.O.E. <br />(GJ160) -6/25!87 The managment plan has not been <br /> completed, but COE apprv'd process by <br /> which plan will be done. (This the plan <br /> prep. by BRec, modified and app r. by COE <br /> -11/13/87 Preimpoundment macro invert. <br /> sampling comp)., results to COE, rept. <br /> dated 11/87. Next sample to be taken. <br /> 3 yrs. after reservoir has filled. <br /> (Bill Emblad stated DOW would pick up <br /> cost of the study if needed for fishery <br /> analysis information. See 11/30/87 I[r J <br /> -8/25/88 Ltr. from DOW approved location <br /> of lower guaging sta. and recommends a <br /> location for the upper one. <br /> -9/22/88 FERC issues permit for 6vaging 1 <br /> station. (Permit mentions a USER letter <br /> of arp rv'1 dated 8/22/88 - no[ on file <br /> in GJPOJ <br /> -11/02/88 meeting B. Tolbin, USGS showed <br />' preliminary Water Qual. Mgt. Pln., <br /> Comments on plan to be coordinated thru <br /> L.Bean by )2/02/88. <br />-))/18/88 WQMP review by L.eean showed that "Baseline Water <br />Quality, Criteria, and Preimpoundment Honi to rin6 Report" has <br /> <br />