My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00260
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00260
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:14 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:46:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153484
Contractor Name
San Luis Valley Water Conservation District
Contract Type
Grant
Water District
0
County
Rio Grande
Bill Number
FSG
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Contract Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />RIO GRANDE WATER SUPPLY STUDY - PHASE I - STEP TWO <br /> <br />Task 11-6 CONTINUED <br /> <br />Case D: <br /> <br />Case E: <br /> <br />Case F: <br /> <br />Case G: <br /> <br />alternative Closed Basin operating scenario <br />on storable flows. <br /> <br />The alternative Rio Grande Project Demand <br />(other than 650,000 af/year) formulated in <br />Task 11-3 will be superimposed on the first <br />Closed Basin Project Scenario (Case B). The <br />results from this Case will be compared with <br />Case B in determining the effect of an <br />al ternati ve Rio Grande proj ect Demand on <br />storable flows. <br /> <br />The alternative Rio Grande Project Demand <br />(other than 650,000 af/year) formulated in <br />Task 11-3 will be superimposed on the second <br />Closed Basin Project Scenario (Case C). The <br />results from this Case will be compared with <br />Case C in determining the effect of an <br />alternative Rio Grande Project Demand on <br />storable flows. <br /> <br />The alternative Rio Grande mainstem diversion <br />demand (alternative to Step One derivation) <br />formulated in Task 11-5 will be superimposed <br />on the first Closed Basin Proi e::t Scenario <br />(Case B). The resu~~s from ~his Case will be <br />compared with Case B in determining the <br />effect of an alternative Rio Grande mainstem <br />diversion demands on the storable flows. <br /> <br />The alternative Rio Grande mainstem diversion <br />demand (alternative "'Co Step One derivation) <br />formulated in TaSK 11-5 will be superimposed <br />on the second Closed Basin Pro] ect Scenario <br />(Case C). The results from this Case will be <br />compared with Case C in determining the <br />effect of an alternative Rio Grande mainstem <br />diversion demands on the storable flows 0 <br /> <br />As the study proceeds, it may be desirable to <br />develop additional scenarios to those indicated <br />above. The budget has included simulations of <br />seven scenarios and if additional simulations are <br />desired, then an additional budget of $ 1,000 per <br />simulation would be required cover the set-up ofl <br /> <br />June 17, 1988 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers,lnc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.