Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CHAPTER VII MISSOURI HEIGHTS ENLARGEMENT pLAN <br /> Summary of benefits <br /> Outdoor <br /> residen- <br />Benefit tial use Irri~tion Recreation Total <br />:Benefits <br />Direct $355,000 $41,900 $15,000 $41l,9QO <br />Indirect and public 9,100 9,100 <br />Total 355,000 51,000 15,000 421,000 <br />Negative effects -300 -300 <br />Total benefits <br />Direct 354,700 41,900 15,000 4n,600 <br />Indirect and public 9,100 9,100 <br />Total 354,700 51,000 15,000 420,700 <br /> <br />Annual e'l.uivalent costs <br /> <br />Annual equivalent costs used for comparison with the annual benefits <br />are estimated at $249,700 as shown below. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Cost item <br />Project investment <br />Construction cost <br />Interest during construction <br />Less costs of investigations <br />Total <br />Operation, maintenance, and re- <br />placement costs <br />Share of Colorado River Storage <br />Project costs <br />Total <br /> <br />Total cost <br /> <br />Average <br />annual <br />cost <br /> <br />$4,536,000 <br />338,000 <br />-683,000 <br />4,191,000 <br /> <br />$231,600 <br />14,500 <br /> <br />3,600 <br />249,700 <br /> <br />Benefit-cost ratio <br /> <br />For the 100-year period of analysis, total benefits estimated for <br />the Missouri Heights enlargement plan compare with the average annual <br />e'l.uivalent cost in a ratio of 1.68 to 1. <br /> <br />Financial Analysis <br /> <br />Cost allocations <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Costs of the Missouri Heights enlargement plan have been allocated <br />to outdoor residential use, irrigation, and recreation. The separable <br />costs-remaining benefits method of allocation was used. The use-of- <br />facilities method was considered for this reconnaissance level analysis <br />but was considered inappropriate since recreation is included as a proj- <br />ect purpose. A summary of the allocated costs follows. <br /> <br /> <br />60 <br />