|
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />CHAnER IV
<br />
<br />GRAVITY PIPELINE PLAN
<br />
<br />Summary and benefits
<br />Municipal
<br />and
<br />domestic
<br />use Irrigation
<br />
<br />Outdoor
<br />residential
<br />use
<br />
<br />Total
<br />
<br />Benefits
<br />Direct $1,237,900 $254,500 $860,200
<br />Indirect and public 55,700
<br />Total 1,237,900 310,200 860,200
<br />Negative effects -500 -600 -300
<br />Total benefits
<br />Direct 1,237,400 254,400 859,900
<br />Indirect and public 55,200
<br />Total 1,237,400 309,600 859,900
<br /> Annual equivalent costs
<br />
<br />$2,352,600
<br />55,700
<br />2,408,300
<br />-1,400
<br />
<br />2,351,700
<br />55,200
<br />2,406,900
<br />
<br />Annual equivalent costs used for comparison with the annual benefits
<br />are estimated at $2,082,800 as shown below.
<br />
<br />Cost item
<br />Project investment
<br />Construction cost
<br />Interest during construction
<br />Less costs of investigations
<br />Total
<br />Operation, maintenance, and re-
<br />placement costs
<br />Assigned costs.9f Ruedi Reser-
<br />voir storage!!
<br />Shaxe of Colorado River Storage
<br />Proj ect costs
<br />Total annual equivalent cost
<br />Y Based on average annual use of 20,700
<br />water with cost of $6.50 for each acre-foot.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />Total cost
<br />
<br />Average
<br />annual cost
<br />
<br />$31,310,000
<br />2,707,000
<br />-683,000
<br />33,334,000
<br />
<br />$1,842,000
<br />
<br />88,000
<br />
<br />134,600
<br />
<br />18,200
<br />2,082,800
<br />reservoir
<br />
<br />acre-feet of
<br />
<br />Benefit-cost ratio
<br />
<br />For the 100-year period of analysis, total benefits compare with the
<br />annual equivalent costs in a ratio of 1.16 to 1.
<br />
<br />Financial Analysis
<br />
<br />Cost allocations
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />Costs of the gravity pipeline plan were allocated to municipal and
<br />domestic water and irrigation by the separable costs-remaining benefits
<br />
<br />39
<br />
|