My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00239
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00239
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:13 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:45:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0035X
Contractor Name
Juniper Project USBR 1963
Contract Type
Miscellaneous
Water District
0
County
Moffat
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CHAPTER III <br /> <br />INITIAL DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />The powerplant under the initial stage of development would have an <br />installed capacity of 30,000 kilowatts and a dependable output of about <br />27,000 kilowatts deliverable to load centers after allowances for a 10- <br />percent transmission loss at peak generation, The average annual energy <br />generation would be approximately 148,000,000 kilowatt-hours ~ith about <br />138,000,000 kilowatt-hours deliverable to load centers after transformation <br />and transmission losses estimated at 7 percent of generation, The maximum <br />and minimum static power heads for the powerplant would be 205 feet and <br />164 feet, respectively, with a weighted average operating head of about 193 <br />feet for the 40-year study period. The powerplant would be rated at the <br />minimum static head which is 80 percent of the maximum static head and the <br />dependable generating capability of the plant would therefore be equal to <br />its installed capacity as the reservoir would not be drawn down below the <br />rated head. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The maximum water release through the powerplant for full plant capac- <br />ity output would vary between about 2,200 second-feet at maximum head and <br />2,700 second-feet at minimum head, depending on the reservoir level, Under <br />the reservoir operating criteria, the stream fishery portion of the avail. <br />able water for power production would provide for 2,500 kilowatts of gener- <br />ation at a 100-percent plant factor while the additional firm peaking power <br />water releases would provide for about 27,500 kilowatts of peaking opera- <br />tion at a monthly plant factor of approximately 38 percent. The minimum <br />overall monthly and annual plant factors would be about 43 percent, while <br />the plant factor would average about 56 percent for energy generation over <br />the long-term period 1922 to 1961, inclusive, including energy production <br />from advance water releases for power made in anticipation of reservoir <br />spills in high runoff years. <br /> <br />Economic and Financial Analyses <br /> <br />Comparison of benefits and costs <br /> <br />The economic justification of the initial development was measured <br />by a comparison of benefits and costs, with both the benefits and costs <br />computed as average annual equivalents over a 100-year period at 2 7/8 <br />percent interest. <br /> <br />Irrigation Benefits <br /> <br />The estimate of project irrigation benefits for an irrigable area of <br />9,000 acres is summarized on the following page, This estimate is based <br />on average annual equivalent per acre benefits for the 100-year period of <br />project analysis, with adjustments made for the la-year project develop- <br />ment period. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />68 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.