Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />CHAPTER II <br /> <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br /> <br />Water quality <br /> <br />Chemical analyses of water samples from Yampa River near Maybell show <br />that the water as it would be regulated at Juniper Reservoir should be of <br />excellent quality for irrigation and possible municipal and industrial uses. <br />The analyses show concentrations of about 500 parts per million in total <br />dissolved solids during low flow periods in the late summer and concentra- <br />tions of about 100 parts per million during high flow periods in the spring. <br />The annual mean of dissolved solids is less than 200 parts per million. <br />The water quality at Juniper Reservoir site would be expected to deterio- <br />rate somewhat with additional upstream development but it appears that the <br />water would remain of excellent quality, <br /> <br />Chemical analyses of samples of White River flows indicate that the <br />quality of the water that would be available for direct flow diversion to <br />the Savannah Butte Canal under present conditions of upstream development <br />would be suitable for irrigation use. Possible future developments. how- <br />ever, would likely have a significant effect on the quality of remaining <br />White River water available to the canal. A study of the potential <br />upstream developments and their probable effects would be deltirable in <br />any further study of the potentiaJ. Savannah Butte Canal development. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Return flows from Deadman Bench planned for use under the Wonsits <br />Canal may be too concentrated in dissolved solids to be satisfactory for <br />irrigation. Concentrations of solids would result from the leaching of <br />salts from the soils together with the salt-concentrating effects result- <br />ing from consumptive use of a large part of the irrigation water applied to <br />the lands. Detailed study of the soil characteristics on Deadman Bench <br />will be required to determine the suitability of the expected return flows <br />for irrigation use, <br /> <br />Water rights <br /> <br />Water of the Colorado River Basin has been apportioned for use <br />between the upper and lower basins under terms of the Colorado River Com- <br />pact. The water apportioned to the upper basin by this compact has in <br />turn been further apportioned for use in the States of the upper basin <br />by the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact of 1948, Flows of Yampa River <br />have been further apportioned by the upper basin compact between the States <br />of Colorado and Utah. The preliminary plans for the Juniper project have <br />been made subject to the provisions of these compacts. <br /> <br />Water right filings for the Juniper project were made in the State <br />of Colorado by the Colorado River Water Conservation District in Septem- <br />ber 1959. Filings were made for 844,294 acre-feet of storage in Juniper <br />Reservoir, including 73,226 acre-feet of dead storage, and for 550 second- <br />feet of direct flow of the Yampa River for diversion through the Deadman <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br />