Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Alternative Costs <br /> <br />The water system previously described, with a total project cost of <br /> <br />$500,000, will provide a water supply to most of the proposed service area, <br /> <br />should have the greatest reliability, and will allow future ex~ansion with <br /> <br />a minimum of expense. <br /> <br />There are at least four alternative ways to structure the water supply <br /> <br />system, including the system as proposed. A summary of the alternatives and <br /> <br />the estimated total project cost for each is as follows: <br /> <br />Alternative I - Deep well, tank at 6,970 feet, <br />service to Fox Farm Road <br /> <br />Cost = $500,000 <br /> <br />Alternative 2 - Shallow well, t~~ at 6,970 feet, <br />service to Fox Fa-rm Road <br />lower well cost offset by <br />addition of two PRV stations <br /> <br />Cost = $500,000 <br /> <br />Alternative 3 - Shallow well, tank at 6,970 feet, <br />delay service to Fox Fam. Road <br /> <br />Cost = $394,000 <br /> <br />Alternative 4 -Shallow well, tank at 6,880 feet, <br />no service to Fox Farm Road or <br />areas above 6,800 feet, reduce <br />transmission line and PRV stations <br /> <br />Cost = $337,000 <br /> <br />26 <br />