Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />:1 <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />We evaluated two idealized study sections : the maximum section at about Station <br />3 + 00, and at the seepage area at about Station 115 + 00, The upstream slope for the <br />main embankment averaged about 3:1 (horizontal to vertical), and the downstream slope <br />ranged from about 2.4:1 to about 4:1 on the lower portion of the slope. The exterior <br />slope of the study section taken at about Station 115 + 00 ranged from about 3: 1 on the <br />upstream slope to about 2:1 on the downstream slope. The dam height ranged from <br />42 feet at the maximum section to 13 feet at about Station 115+00, Phreatic levels in <br />the idealized study sections were based on knowledge of the history of the dam and <br />the assumption that the reservoir is returned to full storage capacity (gage height 34,5 <br />feet), The study sections used in the stability analysis are shown on Figure 11, <br /> <br />5,3.4,2 Stability Analysis <br /> <br />We considered standard penetration test results, triaxial test results and our experience <br />for selecting soil parameters for the stability analysis of the existing embankment. <br />Earthquake loading was simulated by psudo.static analysis using a seismic coefficient <br />of 0.10, The parameters used for the stability analysis are presented on Figure 11. The <br />results of our stability analysis, summarized on Figure 11, indicate a minimum factor of <br />safety of 1,6 for static conditions and 1,4 with earthquake loading, thus the stability of <br />the existing embankment appears to be adequate, <br /> <br />Considerable experience-based judgement must be used in applying the results of <br />theoretical stability analyses, since the analyses involve simplifying assumptions, as well <br />as the use of assumed geometry and soil and seepage parameters, which in themselves <br />are not amenable to accurate determination. <br /> <br />5,3,5 SEEPAGE CONDITIONS <br /> <br />A crude but Informative test of seepage loss from Hourglass reservoir was made by the City <br />on September 11, through September 13, 1990. Both the inflow and the outflow to the reservoir <br />were cut off and the reservoir level was observed, Based on the reservoir area-capacity data, <br />the apparent reservoir loss was calculated to be approximately 7 acre.feet per day at gage <br />height 24 feet. Data is not availabie to extrapolate reservoir losses at other gage heights, <br /> <br />5-12 <br />