Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />5.2,3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS <br /> <br />The test holes generally showed 11 to 26 feet of embankment material overtying natural soils. <br />The embankment materials generally consisted of medium dense to dense, slightly silty to silty, <br />gravelly to very gravelly sands. Laboratory test results show that this material has an intemal <br />friction angle ~ with no cohesion, has a natural dry density of 116 pc!, and is non-plastic. <br />'f' "~? <br />,-~'1, I <br />'--- " <br /> <br />The natural materials below the embankment are glacial deposits which consist predominantly <br />of loose to medium dense. clean to silty sands with intertayered sandy silt lenses. Other natural <br />materials in the embankment foundation range from slightly sandy silts and clays to sandy <br />gravels with cobbles, The stratigraphy of the natural materials does not correlate well between <br />test holes. The results of triaxial laboratory testing show that the foundation material has an <br />I <br />internal friction angle Of~h' no cohesion, and has a natural dry density of 125 pc!. Most <br />of the foundation soil samples tested were found to be non-plastic, Alterberg limits tests on <br />a sample of sandy silt from the foundation show a liquid limit of 37 and a plasticity Index of <br />10, <br /> <br />Bedrock was not encountered In any of the test holes to the maximum depth drilled (80 feet). <br /> <br />Free water was measured in the test holes at depths ranging from 19 to 24 feet at the time of <br />drilling or one day later. Information on long-term fluctuations of water levels in the test holes <br />is not available; however, it is expected that water levels in the test holes would vary <br />significantly with the reservoir levels. <br /> <br />5.3.4 STABIUTY OF EXISTING DAM <br /> <br />Our analysis of the stability of the existing dam included consideration of the history of the dam, <br />exterior slope and dam height. internal water level and subsurface soil conditions we found <br />within and beneath the dam, We evaluated this information as described below and selected <br />two idealized study sections for our stability analysis, We assumed soil parameters and Internal <br />water levels that we believe are reasonably conservative considering the history of the dam and <br />the variations in subsurface soil conditions found. <br /> <br />5,2.4.1 Study Sections <br /> <br />5-11 <br />