Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />non-structural options were considered. There are three structural alternatives and one non-structural <br /> <br />alternative. The first structural alternative is repairing problem areas of the existing canal. The <br /> <br />second structural alternative involves lining the existing canal geometry with concrete. The third <br /> <br /> <br />structural alternative involves reshaping the existing canal cross sections and lining defined areas with <br /> <br />concrete. The non-structural alternative involves leaving the existing structure in place with no <br /> <br />repairs. Photographs of Upper Greeley and Loveland Canal are located in Appendix B. <br /> <br />Plan B 1 - Existing Canal Rehabilitation <br />The first alternative studied was rehabilitating the existing canal to eliminate seepage <br />discovered during the field investigation. The seepage is located on a benched section of the canal <br />between Taft Avenue and 1" Street. This alternative includes placing concrete lining from Taft <br />Avenue Bridge to the 1" Street Bridge. No other modifications are required for this alternative. The <br />maximum canying capacity of the existing canal system is approximately 200 cfs. Rehabilitation of <br />the existing canal would not increase the discharge capacity of the canal. <br /> <br />Plan B 2 - Concrete Line Canal for Existing Geometry <br />The second alternative studied consists of lining the entire length of the existing canal with <br />concrete. Under this option no modification of the cross sections are required except for canal <br />reshaping for placing the concrete lining. Existing canal sections containing concrete would also be <br />removed and replaced. The discharge capacity for this alternative would increase to 300 cfs. <br /> <br />Plan B 3 - Concrete Line Canal for Decreed ClIpacity <br />The third alternative includes modifYing the canal geometry and replacing the existing <br />concrete lining. In order to pass the decreed flow of 446 cfs through the upper Greeley and Loveland <br />Canal system, the cross sections of the canal would have to be modified. The modifications include <br />enlarging the bottom width to 20 feet and reshaping the side slopes to 1.5H: 1.0V. The cross sections <br />at bridge openings would not need to be modified under this option. In areas where the existing canal <br />is lined, the modification would include removing the existing concrete, reshaping the channel cross <br />section, and relining the channel with concrete. The rehabilitation would increase the water surface <br /> <br />E:\G&LREPORWPD <br /> <br />31 <br />