My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00223
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00223
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2012 11:31:49 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:44:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153723
Contractor Name
Orchard Mesa Irrigation District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Mesa
Bill Number
HB 95-1155
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />for a pump (Item 12). The existing ditch has problems with all 4 <br />items. <br /> <br />c. Technical Problems. It is essential that the project be completed during <br />the non-irrigation season. Construction shut-downs during the winter are <br />less likely with a pipeline as compared to the concrete lined ditch. <br />Since it must be protected from cold weather, there maybe some <br />periods when it cannot be poured (Item 13). The only major technical <br />problem likely to be encountered during construction is unstable 'material <br />under the pipeline or ditch. This will have to be removed when <br />encountered (Item 14). The life cycle period for the pipeline is <br />expected to be almost double that for the concrete lined ditch and thus <br />scored higher (Item 15). The existing ditch has surpassed its life cycle. <br /> <br />d. Initial Cost. The pipeline and concrete lining alternative will obviously <br />have a greater initial cost. The lined ditch has a higher annual cost due <br />to high maintenance and repayment costs; the existing ditch has high <br />annual O&M costs (plus the cost of salt contributions). <br /> <br />V-17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.