Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.', <br /> <br />. F(;?a~iLJility Stage <br /> <br />The feasibility level study or sGcond stage would begin after <br />the appraisal stage and would require about 4 months to complete. <br />Th9 schedule could change sonle~hat if there is 'field work and the <br />schedllle '=a115 during the winter when it May be difficult to collect <br />the field data. ThG items belo~ describe the process for this stage. <br /> <br />1) 8ased IJpon the plan(s) selected, an appropt'iate scope elf work <br />will be prepat~ed far 3 feasibility stlldy fc,r the plan. The scope of <br />work would incorporate the ewes require~lents for a feasibility study <br />and would address the field wo~k reqLlit~ed, the "level elf detail fOl' <br />the designs, e~c. The scope of WOt'l< for the feasiblity study would <br />confot'ffi to the ewes guideline~ 8nd wOl(ld be discussed with and <br />approved by the District and the ewes before beginning the second <br />stage. The follo\l'Jing iterlls ii"lclude the gerl\:?t"'al rJ'a~]Ylitude of v-Jot"'k to <br />be performed in addition to the ewes guidelines for a feasibility <br />study. 'fhe specific work for e~ch item below would be addressed in <br />the scope of work for this stag~. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2) COYld uct f i C? 1 d stud i €:?5 <br />potential facility sites, <br />thet"'e will be very little <br />possibility of drill holes <br />i ne 1 uded. <br /> <br />if n~cessary such as: geologic review elf <br />t0pography, etc. The study assumes that <br />fie1d 'J'JOt"'~( r"'equit-'ed. For' i'("lst3..nce~ t:ie <br />fo~'" geologic investigations has not been <br /> <br />3) Detet"'mine the potential magnitllde of the environmeYJtal <br />disj....uptions and the jJC:?t....mi,i;<:::. ,:e. g. LtlLlL~ PE:?,,"'rllit) )"....equir...ed, tht....clI.tgh <br />consultation with apprOpt~late agencies. If the permit applicatioYls <br />C2~ be prepared frOM the information generated ~uring this study, <br />they will be prepared and submitted. It is assumed that an <br />i:.?l":vi"r'o~Jrl1eYltl:.1.1 assEssrJlt'?nt l.>Joulcj b2 pr"'epat~ed as par"'t I":lf this item ,':1'(:(; <br />that field work would not be ~"'9quir8C. <br /> <br />4) Prepat'8 designs and cost estimates Cconstructi,,)n and operation) <br />on the required facilities which might include: pipelines, pumps, <br />infilt',"'atioYI gal1e"r"'ie5, Zi darn, a t.-~e.ll, l.>Jater'" tt"'€-?atrllE?Ylt pl<..:\i'"lt, etc. <br />l.t is assunled that Quad maps can be ~lsed for pipeline topography but <br />that detailed topogt"'aphy will be collected on critical facilities <br />that COVEt... .;;\ small a"r"'ea. D"r"'~:{winys or! 2itll by 3511 sheE?ts will be <br />pt"'epB"r"'ed fot... major'" fact lit ie5, "fO"'~ iY"lstal""ICe, plaYl arid pt"'ofi les l.>Ji 11 <br />be prepared for pipelines on a scale of abollt 500 feet equal 1 ir,cn. <br />J-he plans will be prepared to a level adequate to make a cost <br />estimate 3nd generally srlOW flOW the facility would be constructed. <br />rhe p.lan~:. iJ'Jould "("lot b(2 "tel ;j, fiYlal design It-"?\/el, fot.... iYI=5t:i:.'\YlCn, pla'(",s <br />for a dam wOllld l~IOt be sllitable for submission to the State EngirJeer <br />for r9view and appr~oval. Qu,3ntity estimates would only be olade cln <br />ma.jor iter~s that r~a~(e up 15~ or Olore of the total cost. Appropriate <br />contingencies, 0\/8rhead, and Ijes1gn per C2Yltages will be discusseu <br />t.Ji th the CtJCB. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />5) Contac~ and work Wl~n appropriate reVlew agencies such as the <br />L~I':I.L,.:Oi'''',,1d,.:, Ueoz\{'I;rJI,:::'nt ,:.-:': :~E.;:\l-tj'l! tj"1[~ t:ole'j-"',J.do Stat:c"':: :_~ngij"-I'2::-2'i""'~ ,.-:tc. <br />