My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C153321 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
C153321 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2014 11:41:10 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:44:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153321
Contractor Name
Ridgway, Town of
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
60
County
Ouray
Bill Number
SB 78-69
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />1 <br /> <br />The distribution system will be interconnected to provide loop <br /> <br />feeding and eliminate dead ends. Proper appurtenances will be installed to <br /> <br />provide adequate control and routing of water. <br /> <br />2) Storage, Treatment and Transmission Lines: After due and careful <br /> <br />consideration of Alternates I through IVa (revised), the Ridgway Town Board of <br /> <br />Trustees has indicated a unanimous decision in favor of Alternate IVa (revised). <br /> <br />Although not being the cheaper of all the Alternates, it offers the Town sover- <br /> <br /> <br />eign right to the water rights in Austin ,Spring, Ridgway #2 and #3 Springs, <br /> <br /> <br />Coal Creek and Beaver Creek. Accessibility during periods of wet or snowy <br /> <br /> <br />weather is .limited.._ However, ,with the pipeline 'on' a gravity gradient" little <br /> <br />trouble is anticipated'.' ~,-Accegsto the main intake at Beaver Creek and minor,' <br /> <br />structures at the above noted Springs and Coal Creek will be limited, but <br /> <br />proper design will insure little trouble during these times. <br /> <br />As noted in Exhibit Xa. the quality of water is very good. Com- <br /> <br /> <br />paring,these to the Colorado ,Department of Health Standards (Exhibit ~ - Page 5), <br /> <br /> <br />the standards either meet or exceed those required. Of primary concern, how-' <br /> <br /> <br />ever, is the ph of, 7.75. At present the Town's water at the point of transmission <br /> <br /> <br />to the distribution system has a ph of !8.30 which is on the alkalinity side of <br /> <br /> <br />the ph scale (7.0 being neutral with 0 - 7.0 acidic and 7.1 - 14.0 being alka- <br /> <br /> <br />line). Hence, ,the,ph of 7.75 is also on the'alkaline side of the scale. While <br /> <br />the pipeline will eliminate future increase in the ph (i.e., from 7.75 to 8.30), <br /> <br />concern must be given to reducing the existing ph factor to a neutral one of <br /> <br />7.0. This may require additional treatment and if so, an additional cost in <br /> <br />treatment will be incurred. Subsequently, the cost of operation and maintenance <br /> <br />will be reflective of this. <br /> <br />35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.