Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />pipe will be used. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In addition to those comments noted under Alternate <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />IV, Alternate IVa (revised) presents the following additional <br /> <br />advantage: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1) Cost - Alternate IVa (revised) is approximately <br />$12,000.00 cheaper than Alternate IV. A"smaller <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />tank can be used in view of the raw water storage <br /> <br />and pumping unit in the treatment plant which will <br />~ <br />supply additional fire demand protection. This <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />would save approximately $39,000.00. <br /> <br />2) Although monies have been allocated for land and <br /> <br />easements, all of it may not be needed. If the <br /> <br />pipeline can parallel as nearly as possible to the <br /> <br />existing Ridgway Ditch, the right of adverse posses- <br /> <br />sion may be employed due to the continual use of the <br /> <br />ditch. Such would not be the case under Alternate <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />I <br />1 <br /> <br />IV where new routing of the pipeline would require <br /> <br />additional land and easements. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Disadvantages to Alternate IVa (revised) in addition to <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />~hose mentioned under Alternate IV, are: <br /> <br />1) Alternate IV would utilize a more gradual grade with <br /> <br />a paralleling access road. Alternate IVa (revised), <br /> <br />in following the Ridgway Ditch, will have steeper <br /> <br />slopes. These areas at present are problem spots <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br />1 <br />