Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />il <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED <br /> <br />NPIC #6 OUTLET DITCH <br /> <br />The NPIC #6 Outlet Ditch is the conveyance ditch for all waters leaving NPIC Reservoirs #5 and #6. <br />The dams of both NPIC Reservoir #6 and NPIC Reservoir #5 were renovated in 1995 at a cost of <br />approximately 1.6 million dollars, The two reservoirs have a combined storage capacity of 18,000 <br />acre-feet of water, The NPIC #6 Outlet Ditch originates at the outlet to NPIC Reservoir #6 and flows <br />approximately 150 feet south before passing beneath State Highway #1 in a six-foot diameter <br />corrugated metal pipe, The 1300 feet of ditch immediately downstream of Highway I is a deep open <br />channel restricted in width by irrigated cropland on both sides and an access road paralleling the ditch <br />on the west side, The depth of the channel is determined by the Highway I culvert upstream and <br />concrete structures further downstream, Embankment seepage is causing sloughing on both ditch <br />embankments and is beginning to encroach on the adjacent cropland and road, <br /> <br />The width restrictions prevent cutting the embankments to a shallower slope while maintaining the <br />current invert of the channel. Reshaping the embankments to fit the existing geometry would produce <br />slopes that are unstable given the seepage and soil conditions. <br /> <br />Seepage is not only occurring in the embankments, but through the channel floor itself, The bottom of <br />the channel is very soft and will require stabilization before equipment can be supported on it. <br /> <br />Problems associated with the slope stability, seepage, and mucky bottom were considered when <br />developing alternative design and construction options, Initial consideration was given to replacing the <br />ditch with a large diameter pipeline capable of handling emergency flows from NPIC Reservoir #6 but <br />the diameter of pipe required to handle these flows was immediately determined to be cost prohibitive. <br />Using a pipeline to carry only normal irrigation flows was much more economical and NPIC already <br />owned approximately 700 feet of used 54-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP), <br /> <br />A 54-inch RCP placed in the bottom of the ditch with approximately two feet of cover reduces the <br />depth of the channel by nearly seven feet. The reduced depth allows the embankments to be flattened <br />to a stable slope, Emergency flows can be handled in an open channel above the pipeline, <br />Embankment seepage for the buried portion of the embankment can be captured in the granular Rep <br />bedding and conveyed through the bedding to the downstream open channel. <br /> <br />The existing muck bottom will need to be stabilized in order to support the new pipeline and associated <br />backfill, NPIC was able to purchase approximately 2000 cubic yards of ungraded riprap, for the cost <br />of hauling, during the summer of 1998. This material will be used to stabilize the area below the <br />pipeline and will allow seepage to drain downstream. <br /> <br />The final design problem that needed to be solved for the project is the embankment seepage, A <br />piezometer near Highway 1 showed the water table to be at approximately seven feet below the surface <br />at a point less than 100 feet away from the 22-foot deep outlet ditch. Initially, a synthetic geotextile <br />drain was designed for both embankments. The textile was designed to collect seepage from the <br />embankment and drain into a 6-inch diameter pipeline running parallel to the RCP. Figure 2 shows <br />this drain design and a cost estimate for this option is shown in Table 1. <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />