Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />In 1984, the CD OW performed a hydrologic analysis of the Elkhead Lake drainage <br />basin in accordance with the SEO guidelines. The inflow design flood <br />approved by the SEO was 37,387 cfs, which exceeded the primary spillway <br />capacity by over 20,000 cfs. <br /> <br />In April of 1985, the CDOW contracted wi th r~orri son-Knudsen Engi neers, Inc. <br />(MKEl to explore the feasibility of constructing a lining of roller compacted <br />concrete (RCCl over the crest and downstreaM face of the Elkhead Lake Dam to <br />act as an aux il i ary spi 11 way that woul d sati sfy the overtoppi ng requi rements <br />of the SEO. A report entitled "Feasibility of Expanding Spilll~ay Capacity <br />with RCC Overflow Section" was produced. The report concluded that it was not <br />economically feasiole to protect the embankment against overtopping using RCC <br />wi thi n the budget constrai nts of the CDOW. The report suggested, however, <br />that an alternative design utilizing an auxiliary spillway channel through the <br />1 eft abutment controlled by a fuse plug embankment mi ght be economi ca lly <br />feasi b 1 e. <br /> <br />In November 1985, MKE was awarded a contract by the CDOW for final design of <br />the auxiliary spillway. The construction drawings, specifications, final <br />desi 9n report, and cost estimate for thi s ;>roject were submi tted to the SEO <br />for approval in April of 1986. <br /> <br />While preparing the final design of the modification to Elkhead Lake Dam, it <br />became evident that if required excavation material from the auxiliary <br />spillway channel was used directly to raise the existing dam, additional <br />reservoir storage could be provided at a reasonable cost. With the approval <br />of the CDOW and the SED, r~KE and the Colorado River Water Conservation <br />District (CRWCDl attempted to ascertain which water users in the region would <br />be interested in relatively inexpensive storage. The City was the prime <br />candi date because of the deferment of the Estey-Simpson Project. <br /> <br />Based on preliminary cost estimates, the state legislature authorized the <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCBl to make matching funds available to <br />the City, up to $750,000, for construction of the project. The CRWCD and CWCB <br />agreed to divide the cost of preparing a study to determine the feasibility of <br /> <br />- i i - <br />