Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CRAFTER II <br /> <br />PLAN OF DEVELOPMGNT <br /> <br />naturaJ. channels would aJ.so receive return flmfs from higher lands which <br />wOlud be reused in the lower areas. Existing laterals are adequate to <br />serve all other areas of project land. Land drains would be constructed <br />wherever the need for them is demonstrated in actual project operation. <br />Owners of the Gould Dam and Reservoir would be required to perform any <br />rehabilitation work necessary to provide adequate freeboard on the dam <br />and to insure safe passage of flood flmrs through the spillway. This <br />work could be completed by the farmers themselves prior to project con- <br />struction or at least prior to the development periods discussed in <br />Chapter VI. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Flows of soap and Curecanti Creeks would be utilized by the project <br />to the fullest extent practicable except for bypasses for the downstream <br />fisheries as eA':plained in Chapter IV. A small diversion from the head- <br />waters of Curecanti Creek to Smith Fork \fould continue to be made. At <br />the present time some \fater from Soap Creek is used to irrigate lands <br />near the mouth of the stream and late Summer novs of both Soap and Cure- <br />canti Creeks are required for d01n1stream water rights on the Glmnison <br />Ri vel', Hi th construction of the Blue Mesa Reservoir on the Gunnison Hi vet', <br />a feature of the authorized Curecanti unit of the Colorado River Storage <br />project, nearly all of the lands irrigated from Soap Creek \fould be inun- <br />dated, Thus Soap Creek \fater would not be required for these lands. It <br />is planned that reservoirs of the Curecanti unit would be operated to fulJ;y <br />supply dOlffistream rights on the Gunnison River, thus relieving Soap and <br />Curecanti Creeks of responsibility for providing unstored flows for these <br />rights. <br /> <br />A tentative farm unit layout indicates that approximately 12,593 <br />acres of project full service land could be subdivided into 81 family- <br />sized ne\f farm units. The remaining 3,927 acres of full service ~and and <br />the 6,930 acres of supplemental service land would be farmed in existing <br />units \fith probably some minor redistribution of the supplemental service <br />land in various ownerships. The farm units ,.,ould incorporate acreages of <br />nonirrigab~e land interspersed wj th the irrigable land. As a part <br />of project development, the Government would acquire land in private mmer- <br />ship needed for the project and would sell the acquired land along with <br />land already in public olmership to the project settlers. Some technical <br />assistance to the project settlers by the Bureau of Reclamation is planned <br />as a part of project development. <br /> <br />Project Organization <br /> <br />A water conservancy district, to be known as the Fruitland Mesa <br />Water Conservancy District, is currently being organized under the laws <br />of Colorado as thg general contracting and administrative asency for the <br />Fruitland Mesa project. The conservancy district lTOuld levy taxes against <br />. all real property within its boundaries and would be responsible for the <br /> <br />11 <br />