Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The maximum flJl level for Reservoir No. 6 during the years 1940 to 1990 is Gage <br />Height 34.0 feet. The reservoir has been filled to Gage Height 29 feet or above <br />in 16 of the 42 years of record studied; to Gage Height 25 feet or above 23 of <br />the 42 years; to Gage height 20 feet or above 31 of the 42 years; and, to Gage <br />height 15 or above in 36 of the 42 years of record. The lowest flJl level of <br />record for Reservoir No. 6 is 7.0 feet in 1955 disregarding the zero storage levels <br />since the storage restriction in 1984. The average storage level for the dry <br />years of 1954 through 1956 is 11.3 feet for an average capacity of 1221 acre- <br />feet. <br /> <br />The safe yield of the reservoirs could be considered to be the storage for the <br />years 1955 through 1956 of 1,221 acre-feet which is the minimum storage of <br />record from 1940 to 1991. However, things have changed since that time which <br />wouid alter the future minimum storage under a drought similar to that from <br />1953 to 1956. The North Poudre Irrigation Company now has shares of CBT <br />(Colorado-Big Thompson) water that can be introduced into the system and wouid <br />alter the results of a drought as seen in the 1950's. It is not certain what the <br />safe yield would now be with the present makeup of the system and could not be <br />determined without analyzing the whole Cache La Poudre system. If the water <br />storage record is studied for the years from 1960 on and disregarding the years <br />1977 and 1978 the results would indicate a minimum storage for No. 5 at Gage <br />Height 20 feet for a capacity of 4364 acre-feet. For Reservoir No.6, from 1960 <br />to 1980 when restrictions started lowering the level, the normal fill level was in <br />excess of Gage Height 25 feet most years for a capacity of 4936 acre-feet. <br />These values could be indicative of the firm yield for both reservoirs for a total <br />of 9300 acre-feet. <br /> <br />The records may be misleading as to the safe yield of both reservoirs due to <br />external forces on the system. The land irrigated under Reservoir No. 5 and 6 <br />is only 640 acres. Based on this low demand, it is possible the reservoirs have <br />not been filled to capacity because the need has not been there. This is <br />somewhat indicated by a review of the minimum storage levels on Figures IV-l <br />and IV-2. These plots Indicate that during most years the reservoirs have not <br />been emptied but usually are at a water level only 5 to 10 feet lower than the <br />maximum level for any particular year. Their was no need for North Poudre to <br />try to maintain maximum storage in No. 5 and No. 6 and short other reservoirs of <br />needed storage in dry years. As outlined above, the North Poudre system Is <br />treated as one reservoir by the Water Commissioner and in dry years it would be <br />expected that higher reservoirs would be filied rather than No. 5 and 6 where <br />the water could more effectively be managed. Even with this in effect, Reservoir <br />No. 5 was filled to a capacity of 2555 acre-feet or above 80% of the years and <br />Reservoir No.6 was filled to 3189 acre-feet 74% of the years on record. <br /> <br />Based on the water records as indicated above and the changes In the water <br />situation in Northern Colorado over the past 50 years, it is estimated the firm <br />yield for both Reservoir No. 5 and 6 would be in excess of 6,000 acre-feet. <br /> <br />D. Water Quality. The water quality of Reservoir No. 6 is not expected to be a <br />problem. Due to the expected turnover of the reservoir each year a build up of <br />salts and other minerals is not expected. The water supplying Reservoir No. 6 Is <br />runoff from the mountains and from the plains and should be of good quality. <br /> <br />PAGB 6 <br />Chapter IV - No. 6 Feulbillty <br />