Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />TABLE OF CONTENTS <br /> <br />Twin Lakes Dam & Reservoir <br />Page 3. <br /> <br />PAGE <br /> <br />3.0 Hydrology and Hydraul ics 56 <br />3.1 Probable Maximum Flood 56 <br />3.2 Flood Routing 57 <br />3.3 Outlet Works 60 <br />3.4 Dam Breach Analysis 61 <br />4.0 Rehabilitation Alternatives 62 <br />4.1 Technical Alternatives 62 <br />4.2 Cost Estimates 68 <br />4.3 Alternative Selected for Feasibility 68 <br />Design <br />4.4 Alternatives for Transfer of Twin Lakes 69 <br />Reservoir <br />4.4.1 Enl argi ng Peterson Dam and 69 <br />Reservoir <br /> <br />4.4.2 Enlarging Comanche Dam and <br />Reservoir <br />5.0 Feasibility Design 70 <br />5.1 Design Criteria 70 <br />5.1.1 Foundation Design Criteria 70 <br />5.1 .2 RCC Oam Stabi 1 i ty Cri teri a 71 <br />5.1.3 RCC Dam Desi gn Assumpti ons 71 <br />5.1.4 Earth Dike Embankment Stability 72 <br />Cri teri a <br /> <br />70 <br /> <br />5.1.5 Earth Dike Embankment & Foundation 72 <br />Filter and Drainage Criteria <br />5.1.6 Outlet Works Design Criteria 73 <br />5.1. 7 Spillway Design Criteria 73 <br />5.2 Design Descriptions 74 <br />5.2.1 RCC Dam Foundation 74 <br />5.2.2 RCC Dam 77 <br />5.2.3 Earth Dike Foundation 77 <br />