My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FS0025X Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FS0025X Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2014 4:25:13 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:37:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0025X
Contractor Name
Upper Gunnison Uncompahgre Basin CWRPDA 1989
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Archuleta
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
803
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�1 <br />� <br />Results of a peaking power study which was recently (January 1989) <br />icompleted for the Authority indicate that a total installed peaking capacity <br />of 450 MW (medium growth) to 825 MW (high growth) may be economically <br />Iattractive within the State of Colorado by the year 2007, if the cost of that <br />capacity is in the range of 51000/kW to 51200/kW. It appears, therefore, that <br />� both of the pumped-storage projects evaluated in this study may be financially <br />feasible and could possibly serve as a method for enhancing the financial <br />attractiveness of an in-basin water resource development plan, provided that <br />-{ the economic benefits of the project are shared in an equitable manner between <br />the water supply function and the power supply function of a combined project. <br />8.3 OUT-OF-BASIN WATER SALES <br />8.3.1 Introduction <br />lThe possibility of exporting water from the study area to the Front Range <br />was investigated as a potential method of enhancing the financial feasibility <br />Iof an in-basin development plan. The purpase of the investigation was to <br />determine if the potential for an export project exists; and if so, to make a <br />Ipreliminary determination as to whether such a project appears to be <br />financially feasible and therefore would warrant further, more detailed siudy. <br />I Water sales to downstream states was not investigated due to institutional <br />constraints associated with such an arrangement. <br />+ A review of existing data and reports identified three previously studied <br />projects which would divert water from the Upper Taylor River basin to either <br />� the Arkansas River basin or the South Platte River basin. These �rojects are: <br />o the Collegiate Range Project as proposed by the City of Aurora; <br />o the Union Park Water Supply Project as proposed by Arapahoe County; <br />and <br />o the Central Colorado Project as evaluated by the Central Colorada <br />Water Conservancy District. <br />8-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.