Laserfiche WebLink
and were evaluated in greater detail. Preliminary layouts and cost estimates <br />were prepared for these two projects. <br />The Needle Point No. 3 project is located on the north side of Morrow <br />Point Reservoir and about one mile west of Curecanti Lreek. It has an average <br />gross head of about 1930 feet which can support an installed capacity of 720 <br />MW. As shown on Figure 8.1, this project utilizes the existing Morrow Point <br />Reservoir for the lower reservoir. The estimated total capital cost of the <br />project is approximately 5577 million. This results in a unit capital cost of <br />about;$SOO.per installed kilowatt. <br />The Rocky Point pumped-storage project, located on the north side of <br />Taylor P.ark Reservoir, uses that existing reservoir as its lower reservoir. <br />As presently proposed by the project proponent, Natural Energy Resources <br />Company (NECO),. this project has an installed capacity.of 1000 MW computed on <br />the basis of generating power about eight hours per day, five days per week. <br />In order to put this project on the same basis as all the other projects <br />considered, it was necessary to increase the size of the upper reservoir to <br />provide sufficient storage to generate power 10 hours per day, five days per <br />week, which is the criteria established in this study. The general project <br />configuration is shown on Figure 8.2. The estimated cost is the same as <br />presented in .NECO's Federal Energy Regulatory Commission license application <br />with a modification to the upper reservoir cost. The estimate has also been <br />updated to the January 1989 price level. The estimated total capital cost for <br />this project is approximately E920 million. This results in a unit capital <br />cost of about $920 per installed kilowatt. <br />Comparisons between these two projects on the basis of the data presented <br />herein should be avoided since they have been studied to different levels of <br />detail. The Rocky Point project has been studied to full feasibility level of <br />detail, including geotechnical field and laboratory investigations. As a <br />result, the cost estimate for that project has a much lower risk of error due <br />to unknown or unforeseen conditions than the Needle Point No. 3 project, which <br />has been studied at a prefeasibility level. <br />[� <br />