Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />TABLE 4-4 <br /> <br />PROJECTED WATER SAVINGS THROUGH WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES (Concluded) <br /> <br />ReferencejLocation <br /> <br />Units <br /> <br /> 1 2 1 4 5 <br /> Modification <br /> Low Public of Price Horticultural <br />Remarks Flow Devices Education structure Change Water Reuse <br /> <br />6 7 8 <br /> Pressure <br />Water Use and Leakage ET Reduction <br />Restrictions Reduction Program <br />15. NR NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />Excerpts from the <br />Poudre Final at. <br />Covering Non- <br />Structural Plan <br />Elements <br />Unknown Date <br />poudre Basin <br />Colorado <br /> <br />~ <br />I <br />..... <br />o <br /> <br />Water Conserving <br />Landscapes Show <br />Impressive Savings <br />- NdWA Journal <br />March, 1987 <br />Marin ct., Calif. <br /> <br />Encouraging Water <br />Conservation in <br />New Landscapes <br />w/connection Fee <br />Discounts from <br />Water Year 1979-1980 <br />Marin Ct., Calif. <br /> <br />city of Aurara- <br />Dept. of Utilities- <br />A Plumbing Retrofit <br />Program for Water <br />Conservation <br />November, 1985 <br />Aurora <br />(See Table 4-5) <br /> <br />1-3%-F Collins <br />(Note H) <br />9%-St. Vnin <br />(Note HI <br />l%-Denver <br />(Note H) <br /> <br />.2 to .4\ <br />dec./l\ inc. <br />in cost <br />7-14% by 2020 <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />10-15\ <br />(Note D) <br /> <br />Average turf size 25% <br />less - turf parameter <br />less than 20 lineal ft., <br />40% turf area hydro- <br />phobic plants and rock, <br />hydrophallic plants in <br />natural wet areas. <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />54\ Savings <br />25% Labor <br />61\ Fert. <br />44\ Herb. <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />17% less turf area <br />turf away from <br />foundations, hydrophobic <br />plant cover <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />40% less <br />irrig. app. <br />24\: total <br />demand reduc. <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />NR <br /> <br />Notes: <br />A Retrofitting plans <br />B Implement plumbing codes <br />C Natural replacement <br />D Implement in new construction <br />E Installation of kits sent out by City water departments <br /> <br />NR = Not reported. <br /> <br />F with water restrictions <br />G Lawn size reduction <br />H Residential <br />I Water utilities <br />J Industrial <br /> <br />K Reduction of plant coverr to 50-70% of lawn <br />L Double price of water <br />M Increasing block rate <br />N Uniform charge based on marginal cost <br />o Xeriscopic landscapes (hydrophobic plant coverl <br />