Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />the Northern Colorado Vater Conservancy District (NCVCD) and the Municipal <br /> <br />Subdistrict of the NCVCD in partnership with the Bureau of Reclamation. <br /> <br /> <br />The projects transport CBT and Vindy Gap water across the Continental <br /> <br /> <br />Divide and deliver that water to shareholders along the Front Range in <br /> <br /> <br />northeastern Colorado. <br /> <br />In the Phase I study, water supplies available from the City's four major <br />water sources were compared to forecasted water demand for three population <br />growth rates shown in Table 1. The total quantity of water available from <br />these sources was compared to projected demands to determine the magnitude <br />of the water supply surplus or deficit for recurrence intervals of 25, 50, <br />100, and 200 years. <br /> <br />The Phase I study concluded that water supply deficits would be encountered <br /> <br /> <br />at one or more of these recurrence intervals when the average annual demand <br /> <br />equaled or exceeded approximately 15,700 acre-feet (ac-ft). COM <br /> <br /> <br />recommended that the City develop sufficient water supplies to eliminate <br /> <br />projected deficits at the 100-year recurrence interval for an annual demand <br /> <br /> <br />of 21,261 ac-ft; this demand corresponded to a 30 year planning horizon <br /> <br /> <br />under the moderate growth rate scenario (i.e., 3.5 percent increase in <br /> <br /> <br />demand/year). <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The City directed COM to conduct the Phase II study to evaluate <br />alternatives which could be implemented to eliminate the deficits at the <br />recommended recurrence interval and demand conditions. A set of "Design <br />Conditions" was defined as the projected water supply sources and demands <br />to be used as the basis for evaluating alternative water supply options. <br />The specific Design Conditions are summarized in Table 2. The methodology <br />for performing the Phase II evaluations is described below. <br /> <br />Evaluation of Operational Factors - Computer models were developed in Phase <br />I to simulate the monthly operation of the City's water supply system using <br />1000-year synthetic streamflow records developed for the CBT and Vindy Gap <br />projects and the Big Thompson River. These models were modified in Phase <br /> <br />-2- <br />