My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00106
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:06 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:35:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153494
Contractor Name
Loveland, City of
Water District
0
County
Larimer
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />whereas in Phase I deficits occurred much less frequently at one every 6.2 <br /> <br />years. Thus, future deficits are predicted to be less severe in magnitude <br /> <br /> <br />but more frequent in occurrence than originally estimated in Phase I. The <br /> <br /> <br />principal reasons for these differences is described below. <br /> <br />Inclusion of Eas't Slope storage capacity and allowance for the carry-over <br />of CBT quotas resulted in a net increase in CBT and Yindy Gap availability <br />during critically dry periods. The capacity constraints of the CHFC <br />minimally affect the City's water supply during critical periods; a <br />simulation run without any constraints reduced the Design Condition deficit <br />by approximately 300 AF. The constraint of not diverting more than 50 <br />percent of Loveland's CaT entitlement during the winter (see Technical <br />Appendix) resulted in approximately equal occurrences of many low-magnitude <br />deficits during the late fall (September and October) and early spring <br />(March) months. In conrast, Phase I showed the vast majority of deficits <br />to occur in the spring. In Phase I, deficits were of greater severity but <br />occurred less frequently. <br /> <br />Table 3-1 provides a summary of the water supplies diverted from the City's <br /> <br /> <br />various sources of water. The values shown represent average annual amounts <br /> <br />computed over the entire 1,000-year simulation. To facilitate comparisons <br /> <br /> <br />to results presented in subsequent sections, these values are shown to the <br /> <br /> <br />nearest acre-foot/year (AFY); this does not imply that the accuracy of the <br /> <br /> <br />modeling results is within one AFY. The amounts of water available in any <br /> <br /> <br />given year were, in many cases, much greater than the amounts utilized, <br /> <br />since demand could often be met using less than the total available supply. <br /> <br />On average, the availability of Transfer Decree waters is estimated at <br />11,499 AFY under the Design Conditions. Of this amount, the City will <br />divert an average 6,409 AFY (56 percent) directly to demand. Approximately <br />5090 AFY of transfer decree water would remain. The full amount of the <br />remaining water is not storable due to the limitations of the Transfer <br />Decree and Charles Hansen Feeder Canal capacity constraints. The model <br />results indicated that an average value of 3,442 AFY would be available for <br /> <br />3-14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.