Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I 0 <br />. <br />~ <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />PHASE II - TASK 3: EVALUATION OF <br />PLAN ELEIlENTS VITB RESPECT TO YIELD <br />AND COST (cont.) <br /> <br />a. South Side <br /> <br />b. Barnes <br /> <br />c. Chubbuck <br /> <br />d. Big Thompson <br /> <br />e. George Rist <br /> <br />f. Farmers <br /> <br />g. All of the above <br /> <br />Reuse of Yindy Gap and Stored Tr~nsfer Decree Yater <br /> <br />COM will meet with City staff to discuss and formulate possible <br />agreements which might be made with other Front Range water users for <br />the sale of Yindy Gap and stored transfer decree water. The Quantity <br />of water which could be sold would consist of the nonconsumptive <br />portions of these waters returned to the Big Thompson River at the <br />City's wastewater treatment plant. One reuse agreement for Yindy Gap <br />and one re-use agreement for transfer decree water will be formulated <br />and evaluated. It is assumed for costing that no model revisions will <br />be necessary to evaluate this Plan Element. <br /> <br />Ground Vater Development <br /> <br />COM will <br />quantity <br />deposits <br />Valley. <br />drilling, <br />estimates. <br />yield from <br />potentially <br /> <br />review available data and published reports to estimate the <br />of ground water that might be developed in the alluvial <br />and underlying bedrock formations of the Big Thompson River <br />This Plan of Study does not include field work (ex. test well <br />pump tests, or surficial geologic surveys) to verify these <br />Only those formations or areas with an estimated potential <br />individual wells of more than 300 gpm will be considered as <br />feasible Plan Elements. <br /> <br />Hunicipal-Agricultural Annual Lease Agreements <br /> <br />This Plan Element assumes that the City could enter into lease <br />arrangements with agricultural interests where the City would lease <br />water rights during drier years. Consequently, agricultural lands <br />would be taken out of production temporarily and the City would obtain <br />additional short-term water supplies. For evaluation of yield, a <br />portion of the leased water would be left in the river to ensure that <br />downstream water rights owners would not be injured. The evaluation <br /> <br />3-11 <br />