Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Western Mutual Diversion Repairs and Improvements <br />eWeB Feasibility Study <br />May 6, 1998 (Revised December 29, 1998) <br /> <br />The Company's engineer provided technical engineering assistance in the evaluation of the above <br />alternatives, The critical check replacement design issue was providing the ability to check the <br />river up to historical levels to restore physical diversion capacity, while also providing a low flow <br />bypass to be used if repairs need to be made to the main diversion dam and/or head gate. This <br />required that water flow over the top of the check structure during high flows and be prevented <br />from flowing in the south channel during low flows, maximizing the ability to divert at the ditch <br />headgate, Another consideration was the protection of the island located between the north <br />channel and south channel. Without erosion protection the island might erode away sufficiently to <br />cause the river to take a different course, <br /> <br />Island Revetment Alternatives Evaluated <br /> <br />In order to prevent further erosion of the island formed between the north and south channels of <br />the South Platte River, the Ditch Company seeks to construct an erosion barrier, or revetment, on <br />the eastern end of the island from the south end of the Company's diversion dam, to the north end <br />of the proposed new check structure. Two materials were evaluated for this construction, concrete <br />rubble riprap and rock riprap, Both would be built on a granular bedding layer proposed to be 3- <br />inch minus crushed recycled concrete. Because the size required for the revetment, an average <br />stone size (dso) of 8 inches, is not very large (recycled concrete is not available in very large sizes <br />with desirable shape characteristics), either material would be technically feasible. A cost <br />difference of $10 per ton ($17-20 per ton for rock riprap vs. $7-10 per ton for recycled concrete) <br />makes the recycled concrete aggregate more economically feasible. Estimated construction costs <br />for the island revetment are presented in Table 3, <br /> <br />Table 3 <br /> <br />Summary of Estimated Island Revetment Costs <br />Western Mutual Ditch - Diversion Repairs and Improvements <br /> <br />Island Revetment - Recycled Concrete Rubble Riprap <br />Description Quantity Unit Unit Costs Item Costs <br /> Low Estimate High Estimate Low Estimate High Estimate <br />Riprap 2,200 Tons $7,00 $10.00 $15,400,00 $22,000,00 <br />Bedding 900 Tons $11 ,00 $ 13. 00 $9,900,00 $11,700,00 <br />Total $25,300.00 $33,700.00 <br /> <br />(Continued) <br /> <br />6 <br />