My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00091
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00091
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:17:45 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:35:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153706
Contractor Name
Lower Arkansas Water Management Association
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
67
County
Prowers
Bill Number
SB 96-124
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />the availability of grant and loan funds from the Colorado Water Conservation Board, and the <br />availability of suitable replacement sources. Initially, LAWMA plans to operate under annual <br />written plans, but eventually plans to adjudicate a permanent plan for augmentation. <br /> <br />LA WMA has identified the following six tasks that it believes will be necessary to <br />prepare the replacement plan and to fully define the scope of the project: <br /> <br />Task 1 - Assessina the impacts or potential impacts of the Rulina of the Special Master. <br /> <br />A ruling is expected from the Special Master in Kansas v. Colorado in January. This <br />ruling could have a major impact on the level and timing of well regulation imposed by the <br />State Engineer and on the amount of replacement water that will have to be provided by <br />LAWMA. This task, therefore, will consist of studying the ruling when it becomes available <br />and of assessing its impact on LAWMA's replacement water requirements. In particular, the <br />following issues will be considered during the assessment of the impacts of the ruling: <br /> <br />a) Whether replacement will be required for total pumping, pumping that occurs <br />during Thursday through Sunday, pumping that occurs from post-compact <br />wells, or some combination thereof. <br /> <br />b) What level of replacement, if any, will have to be made to Kansas at the <br />stateline. and for which class or classes of well users will the replacement have <br />to be made. <br /> <br />c) Whether Colorado can take credit for the benefits that accrue to Kansas under <br />the 1980 storage account resolution in John Martin Reservoir. <br /> <br />d) What are the appropriate criteria for determining times when unused flow is <br />occurring in the Arkansas River in Kansas. <br /> <br />Task 2 - Developina the data collection and computational procedures to estimate the <br />pumpina that occurs at LAWMA wells. <br /> <br />This task will consist of developing the data collection and computational procedures <br />necessary to estimate the pumping from the members' wells. It will involve the following <br />work items: <br /> <br />a) Continuing to update the well data base and mapping as additional data becomes <br />available. <br /> <br />b) Compiling the results of the well testing program and evaluating the results for <br />accuracy and adequacy. <br /> <br />c) As necessary, collecting additional data and information concerning the use of the <br />members' wells. This additional data and information will document specific practices <br />such as whether the well water is used in conjunction with surface water and whether <br />there is greater reliance on well water during certain seasons of the year. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.