My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C153445 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
C153445 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:29:57 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:35:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153445
Contractor Name
Summit Reservoir and Irrigation Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
32
County
Montezuma
Bill Number
HB 84-1128
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHAPTER VII ~ PROJECT EVALUATION <br /> <br />The purpose of this chapte~ is to establish the capability of <br />Summit to repay the funds. required to perform the work described <br />previously. Repayment capability of agriculture generally requires <br />an indepth evaluation of crops raised, yields, on-fa~m expenses, <br />and estimates of the value of crops. The funds. are not available <br />to accomplish a similar evaluation for Summit. <br /> <br />Data is available from the Bureau of Reclamation on repayment <br />ability of agriculture in the Dolores and Animas-LaPlata Projects. <br />Summit lands are at a similar eJ.evation, or a little higher, to <br />lands in those projects and the soils are similar. Reclamation <br />estimated repayment abilities of $19/acre for Dolores and $23/acre <br />for Animas-LaPlata. Animas~LaPlata figure~ were estimated 3 years <br />after Dolores and are more representative because of that. For <br />purposes of this study the values will be averaged and a value of <br />$21/acre used. . <br /> <br />The $21/acre is for a full water supply but SUmIllit only has a <br />50% supply on the average. Again, for purposes of this study, the <br />$21/acre will be multiplied by 50% to estimate the repayment abil- <br />ity;of Summit; the result is $10.50/acre. Actually more than 50% <br />of the production is achieved with a 50% water supply but how much <br />more is subject to speculation. Assuming a direct proportion, <br />will provide conservative results. . <br /> <br />Summit has 400 shares of water for about 4000 acres, which on <br />the average is 1 share per 10 acres. Ten acres, or 1 share has a <br />repayment capability of $105 (10 acres x $10.50/acre). As stated <br />in Chapter II the current assessment per share is $90.00 so there <br />is the potential to raise the amount to $105. In 1982 the assess- <br />ment was $102 which also indicates willingness to pay. . <br /> <br />In summary, Summit shareholders have the financial capability <br />to pay about $105 per share. No other' purposes, i.e. fish and <br />recreation, will be contributors to repayment of the. repairs. <br /> <br />-34- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.