My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00084
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00084
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:05 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:35:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150139
Contractor Name
Coal Creek
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Fremont
Bill Number
MC3
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~~r~u ~w, v~,~o r~ ~U~O~6:624.MARTIN AND WOOD WATER <br /> <br />1'.~006/015 <br /> <br />4, Town of RocJcvale <br /> <br />Rotltvale's strictly existing water supply, which consists SQlely of its <br />W.H. May Ditch water rights, is adequate for tile Town's cUiteDt (year <br />2001) average annual water .requirement of 49 acre-frel,' and it Will be <br />adequate for the Town's year 2010 average anmlal requireJ1Jent Of 84 <br />IICIe- feet. <br /> <br />The Town of Rockvale has no other water rights at this time. <br /> <br />C. Membm' Needs for Future Watar Requirement, <br /> <br />}, General <br /> <br />The following discussion of tho adequacy of each Membe.r~s existing <br />water supply for its future water requiremenlll is again based on a d.Irect <br />flow analysis of supply and demand, without consideration iiven to raw <br />water SlOIage in Oak Creek Reservoir. When a givm MCJ<Ibei's, existing <br />supply i,s deemed inadequate for a given future year's watii reqUkem.ent, <br />Un$ repott identifies the additiolllll number of Union Ditch shafos which <br />the given Member could acquire to make its water supplY;',!fIdequate. <br />Thls report a1so identifies the number of shares in both Umon: ')?itch and <br />Fremont County Ditch that the given Member could acquifO to>tender iti <br />wa1m' supply adequate. ' " <br /> <br />Also, the readl% should understalld that the number of additional T1nion <br />Ditch, or Union Ditch-pius-Fremont COUllty Ditch shite&, which are <br />indicated herein to be needed is a good general guideline for Members of <br />the Regional System, but experience will likdy indicate a. need for <br />samcwhll1 m~ shares than indicated herein. That the rtumber of <br />liddltioJlal shares identifJ.eCl herein may be less than the 'number aciually <br />needed is due to Ibis report's use of a COIlStallt daily watel r~wement <br />(in cf~) durin, each seoarato month of the 1971-1994 ~tudy p&,iod.- Par <br />example, for the year 2040 annual treated water requirement of 394 acre- <br />feet for Coal Creek, \iliA report calculates a constant daily ?t'ater <br />requirement of 0.91 cfs for Coal Creek for July, 1980. .In other WOrds. <br />this report uses a constant treated 'l'atcr demand oI 0,91 cis every day of <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.