Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />August 8, 1995 <br />Honorable Mayor Rippy and Board of Trustees <br />Town of New Castle <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />III. EaR DEMAND AND PHYSICAL WATER SUPPLY <br /> <br />Following the water rights worksheet, are attached worksheets which identify the Town of <br />New Castle water treatment capacity as of August 1, 1995. In-recent discussions with Skip <br />Marino, the plant capacity when the water diverted from East Elk Creek is in a turbid (high <br />runoff) condition, the maximum capacity or production of water from the water treatment <br />plant is 360 GPM. Based upon this scenario, this 360 GPM capacity (which typically occurs <br />from mid-May through June) is equated to 661 EaR's. This 'can be directly related back to <br />the previous, tables in which the compilation of EaR's in New Castle were made. More <br />specifically, the EOR'~s that the plant can produce under turbid conditions is 661 EaR's. In <br />relating-this'backto Table' 3'otthe'compilation'of~EQR'sin'New Castle, the-current demand <br />on the system is 665 EaR's. Under this scenario, the demand on the system is exceeding the <br />supply. Again, this scenario would occur between the period of mid-May through the month <br />of June. <br /> <br />The second worksheet identifies the,better news, which is the'water treatment plant capacity <br />under 'ideal conditions" or when the turbidity is I'OW on East Elk Creek. This typically is <br />occurring from July through May. However, during certain times of the.year"high intensity <br />rainfall events do create high turbidity waters whic.h would reclassify .plant production back <br />into the previous capacities discussed. Under the ideal conditions, the'plantcan produce'522 <br />GPM. Under this scenario, the plant capacity will support 958 EaR's. Relating this back to <br />the compilation of EaR's in New Castle (partrcularly Table 3) identifies that in this scenario, <br />the plant is able to produc'e more waterthan demand on 'the system. <br /> <br />IV . IMMEDIATE NEEDS FOR THE TOWN ,OF NEW CASTLE <br /> <br />As can be interpreted from the previous discussion regarding the EaR demand and physical <br />water supply, the water treatment facilities for the Town of New Castle are under capacity <br />when flow in East Elk Creek has a high turbidity. In fact, in recent discussions with Skip <br />Marino, water usage this month alone has shown that the plant has not been able to meet the <br />demands for water production that the Town has been placing upon it. Therefore, we would <br />recommend immediate action be taken to begin implementation of the Phase I treatment <br />facility expansions. Inclusive in the Phase I treatment facility expansions are the addition of <br />two more filter units to the water treatment plantas well as the final line replacements of the <br />raw water line to the water treatment plant. This Phase I expansion of the treatment facilities <br />as outlined in the attached Dean Gordon letter (of October 31, 1994) would b(ing the plant <br />capacity up to 1200 GPM. This, in turn, would provide a capacity of 140,0 EaR und.er a peak <br />irrigation day. <br /> <br />C:CHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. <br />