Laserfiche WebLink
<br />111-4 <br /> <br />The Triple Creek Ranch development was considered as a potential annexation <br /> <br /> <br />to the Allenspark water system. It is felt that the areas should not be im- <br /> <br /> <br />mediately joined, but rather if growth occurs between the separate entities, <br /> <br /> <br />that the systems could be tied together at a later date. The preliminary en- <br /> <br /> <br />gineering layout and design, particularly the elevation of the Allenspark <br /> <br /> <br />diversion and water treatment plant, has been done with this future tie-in <br /> <br />in mind. <br /> <br />The Triple Creek Ranch Development consists of 54 platted lots on 172 acres <br /> <br /> <br />for an average lot size of 3.2 acres. Most of it is served from a water dis- <br /> <br /> <br />tribution system of PVC pipe, 2! inch size and less. The water source is a <br /> <br /> <br />diversion On Willow Creek at elevation 9050 and a diversion on Fox Creek at <br /> <br /> <br />elevation 8975. The raw water flows to a filtration plant at elevation 8925 <br /> <br /> <br />and then to the distribution system. A lift station at the filter plant is <br /> <br /> <br />to serve a few high lots up to elevation 9110. The low point in the system <br /> <br /> <br />is at elevation 8375. Sewage treatment is either by conventional septic tank- <br /> <br /> <br />leaching field or a small sewage lagoon that serves some lots. As of spring <br /> <br /> <br />1974 there were about ten lots occupied. If the Allenspark system were to <br /> <br /> <br />join with the Triple Creek Ranch, there would be one pressure ZOne from 8500 <br /> <br /> <br />to 8700 and an upper zone for Triple Creek from 8700 to 8850. Lower zones <br /> <br /> <br />for both the area west of Allenspark and the lower portion of Triple Creek <br /> <br /> <br />would be in the range of elevation 8375 to 8500. Preliminary investigations <br /> <br /> <br />show that the cost of a line connecting the two systems is, at this time, <br /> <br /> <br />prohibitive, but should additional development occur between the two, then <br /> <br /> <br />the possibility of joining should ~e investigated more fully. <br /> <br />Based on the historic growth rate of Allenspark and the current economic cir- <br /> <br /> <br />cumstances affecting land development, it seems improbable that the water system <br /> <br /> <br />would have the effect of significa~tly increasing the development of Allenspark. <br /> <br /> <br />These facts, coupled with current adverse attitudes regarding rapid development <br /> <br /> <br />and the lack of a sanitary sewer system, indicate that substantial growth due <br /> <br /> <br />to excessive land development would not occur in Allenspark. Many small mountain <br /> <br /> <br />communities like Allenspark are striving to control and/or curtail land develop- <br /> <br /> <br />ment. Boulder County has regulated minimum lot sizes. Therefore, growth should <br /> <br /> <br />not be relied upon when determining economic feasibility. <br /> <br />: <br />