My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00040
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00040
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:04 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:30:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153446
Contractor Name
Grand Mesa Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Grant
Water District
0
County
Delta
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The second non-structural approach, as indicated at the beginning of this section, <br />would involve changes in the locations where releases from existing reservoirs are <br />used. Return flows are a significant proportion of the total supply of water for <br />meeting crop irrigation requirements. Much of the water which reenters stream <br />channels as return flow is diverted a second time, but a portion of return flows <br />come back to the channel too far downstream to be diverted a second time. These <br />unused return flows are discharged into the Gunnison River and are, in effect, <br />"lost" insofar as irrigators within the Tongue Creek basin are concerned. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />It is estimated that more effective use of return flows could reduce average annual <br />water shortages in the basin by approximately 30 percent. The key to achieving a <br />reduction of this magnitude would be diverting water released from headwaters <br />reservoirs onto cropland at the farthest upstream locations where the water could <br />be used. The reasons why this is not currently being done and the difficulties <br />inherent in implementing such a change are discussed in the following paragraphs. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The small reservoirs in the headwaters area are privately owned by holders of <br />storage rights. Holders of these rights apply water released from the reservoirs to <br />their farms, which are concentrated in the Lower Surface Creek service area <br />(lower basin). (The lands irrigated by reservoir releases are concentrated in the <br />lower basin because agriculture in the project area started earlier in the lower <br />basin than in the upper basin.) <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br /> <br />Under the prevailing arrangements for operation of the reservoirs, a holder of a <br />storage right does not necessarily receive water released from his reservoir. A <br />schedule of exchanges is developed annually by the Grand Mesa Water Users' <br />Association, whose members are holders of storage rights. However, farmers who <br />receive water released from a reservoir do hold a storage right, and the matter of <br />which reservoir is the source of the water the farmer receives is of secondary <br />importance. As a consequence of the concentration in the lower basin of lands <br />whose owners hold storage rights, approximately 4,300 acre-feet of return flows <br />from diverted reservoir releases are unused each year, on the average. <br /> <br />The consultant conducted an operation study based on a hypothetical reservoir <br /> <br /> <br />operation policy of using releases to meet all water requirements in the upper <br /> <br />IV-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.