My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00040
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00040
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:04 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:30:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153446
Contractor Name
Grand Mesa Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Grant
Water District
0
County
Delta
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Section 3: Tongue Creek Options <br /> <br />Options in the Tongue Creek basin include potential dam sites and possible non- <br />structur al measures described below. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />A. Non-Structural Measures <br /> <br />Two non-structural approaches to increase the availability of water to irrigate <br />crops, without constructing new storage capacity or importing surplus water from <br />other basins, were considered: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I. Reduce the quantity of water diverted to correspond more closely to <br />crop irrigation requirements, as determined by analysis. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2. Change the locations where releases from the existing reservoirs are <br />mainly used. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Better on-farm water management by irrigators primarily consists of closely <br />monitoring the application of additional water not required by crops. The <br />consultant detected poor prospects for changes that would make more water <br />available for use. When water is abundant in the spring, farmers often apply more <br />water than their crops require. However, they do this when water is abundant, so <br />their "over-irrigation" does not deprive downstream irrigators of sufficient water. <br />In fact, much of the water in excess of crop irrigation requirements which is <br />diverted in the spring eventually reenters the creek as return flows which may then <br />be available for use. This water would have been discharged into the Gunnison <br />River if it had remained in the creek channel without being diverted to cropland. <br />Over-irrigation in the spring is, in effect, a form of temporary storage. Reduction <br />in amounts diverted to conform more closely to crop requirements would not, by <br />itself, be significantly helpful. On the other hand, if flows in excess of crop <br />requirements were being used in the spring to fill a new reservoir, it might in those <br />circumstances be appropriate to bring diversions into closer conformity with crop <br />needs, but naturally without trying to reduce anyone's diversion to less than his <br />recognized diversion right. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />IV-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.