Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />of outflows from Tongue Creek into the Gunnison River. Most of the outflows <br />occurred in the spring months of high flows. <br /> <br />One important aspect of the proposed operation of the basin was that irrigation <br />demands would be met first in the upper service area by the streamflows and local <br />return flows. Remaining stream flows and generated return flows were then applied <br />to meet the lower service area demands. If during one particular month these <br />demands were met and water was still present in the stream, the amount was <br />marked as surplus water. If this water was present in the stream in the upper <br />service area, then it was shown as available for storage in the proposed reservoir. <br />If during one other month a portion of the demands in the lower service area could <br />not be met from the stream and return flows, then that amount was shown as to be <br />replaced by the proposed reservoir. <br /> <br />For the Leroux Creek basin, studies made by the USBR quantified water available <br />for development upstream from the site where surplus water could potentially be <br />diverted to the basin of Tongue and Surface Creeks, via an extension of Overland <br />Ditch. The USBR studies covered the years of 1941 to 1966. The consultant <br />extended the USBR data by generating quantities available for development from <br />1967 through 1984, in years of low, normal, and high stream flows. <br /> <br />With regard to water available for development in the basins of streams which are <br />intercepted by Overland Ditch (these streams contribute water to the ditch), the <br />USBR once studied a possible Grand Mesa Canal which, if constructed, would have <br />conveyed surplus water from the intercepted streams to the Tongue Creek basin. <br />The Grand Mesa Canal, as considered by the USBR, would have followed a route <br />generally parallel to Overland Ditch. The USBR determined quantities of water at <br />each intercepted stream which would be available for inter basin transfer via the <br />Grand Mesa Canal. Essentially, the same quantities would also be available for <br />interbasin transfer by way of the existing Overland Ditch, given the generally <br />parallel routes of the two canals. The USBR study covered the years of 1941 <br />through 1966. The USBR findings were extended to include the years from 1967 to <br />1984, for years of low, normal, and high stream flows. <br /> <br />III-I 8 <br />