My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00040
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00040
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:04 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:30:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153446
Contractor Name
Grand Mesa Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Grant
Water District
0
County
Delta
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />LEROUX CREEK AND OVERLAND DITCH STREAM GAGES <br /> <br /> Square :'vIiles <br />No, Stream Upstream Years of Record <br />09-1345-00 Leroux 34,5 1961 - 1969 <br />09-1327-00 Hubbard 1.33 1961 - 196& <br />09-132&-00 Hubbard 1.36 1961 - 196& <br />09-1329-00 Hubbard 2,34 1961 - 1974 <br /> <br />The data pertaining to Hubbard Creek were expanded to cover the period from 1941 <br />to 1984. Flows in the Muddy Creek tributary, which supplies water to Overland <br />Reservoir (Cow Creek) and in Terror Creek, were estimated based on their <br />similarity and proximity to Hubbard Creek. <br /> <br />Streamflow data in greater detail are given in the Hydrological Data, Appendix A. <br /> <br />Section 3: Water Supply: Return Flows <br /> <br />The supply of water available for use by irrigators consists of streamflows, which <br />were discussed in the preceding section, plus return flows. According to USBR <br />studies, the quanti ties of return flows which reenter stream channels within the <br />project area (and thus become available for application to crops a second time), as <br />well as the locations where return flows are available for reuse, may be estimated <br />as percentages of diversions. In its studies of the Tongue Creek basin, the USBR <br />estimated that the following percentages of diversions probably become return <br />flows for every month during the irrigation season: <br /> <br />RETURN FLOWS (RF) AS PERCENT OF WATER REQUIREMENTS <br /> <br />Area where Quantity of RF Area where RF are <br />RF Originates (% of Diversions) Available for Use <br />Upper Basin 17% Upper Basin <br />Upper Basin 21% Lower Basin <br />Lower Basin 25% Lower Basin <br />Lower Basin 25% Gunnison River <br /> <br />III-& <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.